From Incel Wiki
(Redirected from Fauxbait)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Woman with a highly neotenous face despite having well-developed breasts

Neoteny or pedomorphism refers to an adult organism retaining childlike features. In humans, this means a roundish, soft face with large eyes, short nose, full lips and clear skin, but also overall a shorter and weaker stature. Neoteny is a highly desirable trait in women and women are more neotenous than men in appearance, mentality and behavior (e.g. adult crying). Women use fakeup to enhance their neoteny by smoothing their skin and enhancing eye contrast.[1] Compared to other mammals, humans are overall more neotenous as evidenced by their lack of fur, small teeth, smooth skin and large eyes,[2] presumably as a result of self-domestication and K-selection. As a result, a fairly high amount of neoteny is normal, and sometimes even attractive in men (but presumably only as long it is not an outright feminine appearance regarding chin and eye region).

In men, neoteny can be exaggerated through feminization, resulting in pubefantilism (delayed puberty) and a feminized phenotype which may negatively affect dating prospects (cutecel). A woman with very neotenous features is referred to as a fauxbait.

Women's neoteny steeply declines in their twenties such that women's rate of aging is faster than men's, which is known as hitting the wall.[3] A twenty-five year old woman will already have a less neotenous facial fat distribution and hence appear less sexually attractive than an eighteen year old woman. Men's preference for youthful women can be seen in men's re-marriage patterns: The age gap is three years at first marriage, five years at second marriage, and eight years at third marriage.[4]

Sex differences in neoteny[edit | edit source]

Men are on average 8% taller.

With regards to overall sexual dimorphism in great apes and other mammals, one can distinguish tournament and pair-bonding species. In tournament species, the males are much larger and stronger than the females and the males compete violently (in "tournaments") with a high rate of polygyny and the alpha male violently defending his harem. Contrasting this, sexual dimorphism is much smaller in pair-bonding species where there males are less violent, invest more in the offspring and where the species is overall more K-selected. Humans are regarded to be somewhere in between with a moderate amount of polygyny and accordingly humans only have moderate sexual dimorphism.[5] On the other hand, the amount of resources men provide relative to women is quite extreme compared to most animals and unique among primates, with men providing twice as much calories in hunter-gatherers than women and exclusively providing the more nutrient dense meat from hunting which men used to get mating opportunities and invest into offspring and their mate ever since.[6][7][8] Also, despite only moderate differences in overall body size, men's and women's appearances are still so distinct that humans can categorize faces by sex with 98% accuracy.[9] When relying just on the facial geometry (without skin tone/texture), this drops to 75%.[9] It should be noted that sexual dimorphism may overall be somewhat reduced in industrialized countries due to high mutational load in the gene pool (owing primarily to very low child mortality), and/or due to pollutants and toxins (see also feminization).

Body[edit | edit source]

Children and women have smaller lower-facial features owing to a shorter maxilla and mandible. They also have smaller ears and noses that are less wide and deep (but just as long).

The most obvious physical neotenous trait in women is their shorter stature. Even though men are only about 8% taller on average, this sex difference has a very large effect size of d = 2.0,[10] meaning most men are taller than most women. Accordingly, women also have a weaker physique, especially a weaker upper body and thinner arms leading to large sex differences in lifting, grip strength and especially in throwing with effect sizes of d = 2.5 to 3.0.[11]

An important pedomorphic feature at the gestalt level of the body is the head size relative to the entire body. Women's and men's heads are, however, roughly proportional to their stature without noteworthy sex differences in this ratio.[12][10] Though, women's ratio of head to body size is likely higher when including their fuller, longer hair and more voluminous hair styles,[13] as well as when rather relating women's head to their 11% (d = 1.6) narrower shoulder width and narrower neck. The ratio of maximal cranial width to shoulder significantly, but only slightly different (0.37 vs 0.39),[14] but that excludes women's thinner arms and more voluminous hair due to each hair strand growing for a longer duration (not faster) before it falls out.[15] A more noticeable overall neotenous feature in women is that they are overall less hairy.[16] Less visibly, women have further neotenous traits such as a more delicate skeleton, smaller mastoid processes, smoother ligament attachments, lower basal metabolism, faster heartbeat, larger tear ducts and greater longevity.[16]

Head[edit | edit source]

Women have smaller lower-facial features and a narrower neck.

A neotenous face is marked by a high ratio of neurocranial to lower-facial features, while also exhibiting a small nose and ears and full lips.[17] Women's upper-to-lower-facial-height ratio is 1.23 while men's is 1.07.[9] The eyes are part of the relatively larger neurocranial region and various animal babies have proportionally very large eyes. But while it is true, that men are more sexually attracted to women with larger eyes,[18] women's eyes are not actually larger than men's in absolute terms. Among Caucasians aged 20 to 40, men's eyes are actually slightly wider than women's eyes (28.7±1.9 mm vs 27.7±2 mm).[19][20] There is also no significant sex difference in exposed iris as a fraction of the overall eye area.[21] However, due to women's smaller mandible and nose, women's eyes appear proportionally slightly larger than men's.[22] Women's nose is on average around 12% less deep and wide than men's with a very large effect size of about d = 2,[23][24] but notably women's nasal height is only 3% smaller.[25] Since human perception only estimates sizes relative to the context, not absolute sizes, larger eyes have presumably the same effect on men's sexual attraction as proportionally smaller noses and lower-facial features.

A more substantial sex difference than eye size is that women's eyes are rounder (d = .66 in terms of width-to-height ratio, which is a moderate effect size), while men's eyes tend to be vertically narrower and the corners of the eyes are more rectangular like hunter eyes.[21] This might also make women's eyes appear larger. Another very noticeable sex difference in facial morphology is women's higher eyebrows,[26] which also appears to be pedomorphic and might highlight their eyes more. This sex difference may stem from men's hunter eyes which are framed by more pronounced brow ridges which possibly have the purpose of protecting the eyes from sticks and claws during hunting.[27] The higher eye brows may also enable women to put on a more effective pouting/frowning expression. While men's forehead is slightly concave due to the brow ridge, women's forehead is more smooth and round like that of children.[16][28]

Women's less developed lower-facial features are primarily evidenced by their lower facial depth being about 10% shorter than men's (d = 2.0),[29] i.e. a lower distance from the chin to the ears and less forward growth, owing to a shorter mandible, which is also narrower (d = 1.0).[30] Women's upper and lower lips are about 10% fuller/higher on average (d = 1.0 for the upper lip and d = 0.7 for the lower lip).[31] Women also have a more subcutaneous fat in their faces and their entire bodies.[32] Women are more babyfaced due to these fat deposits and their more developed buccinator muscles. These muscles being more developed in women has been explained by women's greater propensity to smile.[9] Smiling is a neotenous as well with children smiling 20 times as often as adults.[33]

Psychology[edit | edit source]

Women's crying behavior is stuck at roughly that of an 11 year old boy.

Behaviorally, psychologically and neurologically, women also exhibit greater neoteny than men, down to the level of their central nervous system which has younger metabolic characteristics.[34] The most salient childish behavior is women's higher rate of crying, counting on average 4 times as many crying episodes per unit time which matches the rate of 11 year old boys.[35] Women also behave more childishly interacting with their female peers, as evidenced by them being uncooperative and sneaky toward them.[36] Women score about one standard deviation higher in questionnaires measuring neuroticism (though such questionnaires likely underestimate group differences due to groups answering in reference to their own group). Neuroticism refers to emotional instability, which can also be regarded as a neotenous trait as children are generally impatient, cheeky and whiney, and it may be an expression of their greater childish neediness. Women's childish tendency toward compliance and picking up on emotions is evidenced by them being ten times as likely to get infected by mass hysteria.[37] The sex difference in moodiness appears to express as borderline personality disorder in women as an extreme, however, due to women's lower activity level and physical strength, their mental instability less likely reaches pathological or dangerous levels. Nonetheless, women are 2-3 times more often diagnosed with mood disorders, anxiety and depression compared to men.[citation needed] Women also score higher in agreeableness, compliance and withdrawal, which are akin to childish subordination, which also points to immaturity. Interestingly, women do not have a lower general intelligence, as presumably educating the offspring is conductive to reproductive success and it helps being sneaky. Another neotenous trait in between physical and behavioral features would be pitch and loudness of voice as this is partly determined by the chest size acting as resonating body. Women's voice has a substantially higher fundamental frequency, typically remaining at the vocal pitch of prepubescent boys.[38] Women generally have a behavioral bias to expect men to do things for them as evidenced by even feminist women preferring so,[39] which may also serve as evidence of a childlike dependence. Women's neotenous mentality is evidenced by their interest in extremely bluepilled romance fiction such as princess stories etc. (besides rapey romance).[40] In personality questionnaires, women more likely report to cry during movies (d = 0.95), to like flowers (d = 0.81) and dance performances (d = 0.71) when compared to men.[41]

Men's sexual attraction to neoteny[edit | edit source]

Normal erectile responses for healthy nondeviant men (Freund and Costell 1970). More information.

Cross-culturally men report to prefer women with larger eyes,[18] and the importance of women's smaller lower-facial features to men's attraction ratings has also been empirically established cross-culturally.[17] Further, healthy men exhibit a significant involuntary penile arousal in response to visual stimuli of even prepubescent human females (in half of men), with girls aged 12-16 eliciting just as much penile arousal in men as adult women.[42] Highly attractive Italian models in exhibited more babyness with regards to their soft-tissue facial characteristics.[43] There is mixed evidence on more neotenous/feminine looking women to have a higher reproductive success in modern industrialized nations,[44] though one study found women who retain their youthfulness very long do appear to have greater sexual success.[citation needed]

With regards to women's psychological neoteny, there is less evidence for men finding it outright sexually attractive when compared to men's attraction to women's physical neotenous features. In one study, neurotic women had slightly higher reproductive success, however this result was only significant at p < 0.05.[45] Another study found that men are drawn to borderline personality disorder, but only if they are physically attractive.[46]

Evolution of female neoteny[edit | edit source]

Due to sex differences in parental investment, women evolved to be coy and choosy, and men evolved to be taller and stronger than women in an evolutionary arms race among men competing for reproductive opportunities. As a result, women became dependent on men's resources.[47]

Due to women's resource-dependence, it is probable that they retain child-like features such that males are encouraged to invest into them much like humans of either sex invest more in cute looking offspring.[48][49][50] Men's attraction to neotenous females may hence be explained by higher survival rates of cute looking female offspring, with the female offspring being much more dependent on surviving by mere cuteness than the males. Neoteny serves the same purpose in other animals,[48] and due to the relatedness of species, the signaling also works across different species, leading e.g. humans to breed cute looking pets that they take pleasure in providing for.

Interestingly, women’s preferences for men’s facial neoteny (rather than masculinity) are strongest under disfavorable ecological conditions,[51] which may result from similar evolved mate preferences that ensure higher survival rates through cute looking offspring (which is related to Travis-Willard hypothesis, which states that the sex ratio at birth skews female under harsh conditions due to women having a higher survival rate). Though there is also evidence to the contrary that neoteny is less preferred in case of environmental threat.[52]

Another hypothesis for the evolution of female neoteny may be that it has been sexually selected for by males in efforts of ensuring paternity. Different from men, women can always be certain their offspring is their own. As a result, men may have evolved to desire certainty about their paternity. Moreover, being providers of resources, men have extra incentive to minimize the chances of investing in someone else's offspring. Men can best achieve this certainty by monopolizing girls as early as possible, preventing other men from impregnating them. Further, men may have evolved to prefer childish, weak, submissive and obedient women, as those are easy to control. Gowaty (1992) writes:

There should be strong selection on males to control females' reproduction through direct coercive control of females […]. Evolutionary thinkers, whether informed by feminist ideas or not, are not surprised by one of the overwhelming facts of patriarchal cultures, namely that men […] seek to constrain and control the reproductive capacities of women […]. Juvenilization decreases the threat some men may feel when confronted with women; many men are comfortable around women whom they can clearly dominate and are profoundly uncomfortable around women whom they cannot so clearly dominate.[53]

An alternative or additional explanation for men's attraction to female youth may be that women lose their fertility sooner. An older man can still reproduce with a substantially younger woman and does not depend on her ability to protect, whereas women do depend on a protective partner. Women's fertility peaks in their mid twenties, and a clear skin and full lips are signals of youth which women accordingly get selected for as men will perceive women without those features to be older, and judge them to be infertile sooner, reducing their reproductive success. This alone is an insufficient explanation, however, because young boys prefer girls of their own age who do not have maximal fertility.[54]

Adaptions for female neoteny may explain male hebephilia, i.e. the sexual interest in pubescent girls which may affect most men,[55] and, as extreme instantiation of these adaptations, it may also explain pedophilia, i.e. the sexual interest in prepubescent girls. In fact, children's smooth skin and innocence may act as a super stimulus on men's sexual preferences for neoteny. This may also point to female neoteny being a Fisherian adapation.[56]

Men's selection for paternity assurance may even have reduced women's spatial abilities as men would prefer women who are scared of getting lost, rather than ones who are nimble at navigating their ways to different men. It may also explain women's stronger same-sex attraction as men would have preferred their harem women to derive additional sexual pleasure from each other rather than from other men.[57] Another explanation may be that signals of childishness and helplessness acted as a means of ensuring continued investment on part of males, thus females with neotenous behavior such as crying had a better chance of accruing resources for their offspring and thus increasing their survival.

Artificial juvenilization[edit | edit source]

Artificial attempts at achieving a neotenous look is called juvenilism or adolescentilism wherein people (especially women) attempt to look like adolescents and more childlike often by means of fakeup, even when they are actually vicenarian or tricenarian, … or maybe even older.

East Asian men[edit | edit source]

Hominids tended to become more neotenous as they evolved (e.g larger skulls, smaller jaws, less body and facial hair). Humans are more similar in physical appearance to infant chimpanzees as compared to adult chimpanzees because of humans greater levels of neoteny. So the East Asian race (which is the furthest evolved from the African prototype) has the most neoteny.[58] Since women prefer dominant looking men, this gives the less neotenous looking Caucasian males dating advantages over East Asian men. This may explain the SEAmaxxing phenomenon, alongside the alternative explanation that Asian women associate Caucasian males with prosperity and wealth (hypergamy).

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  4. Buss, 1994/2003
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Tanikawa, C., Zere, E., & Takada, K. (2016). Sexual dimorphism in the facial morphology of adult humans: A three-dimensional analysis. HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 67(1), 23–49. doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2015.10.001
  10. 10.0 10.1 Using Finns as reference population for Caucasians
  13. Mesko, N., & Bereczkei, T. (2004). Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displaying phenotypic quality. Human Nature, 15(3), 251–270. doi:10.1007/s12110-004-1008-6
  14. A. Roberto Frisancho. (2008). Anthropometric Standards An Interactive Nutritional Reference of Body Size and Body Composition for Children and Adults. 2nd Edition
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 Montagu A (1989). Growing Young (2nd ed.). Granby, MA: Bergin & Garvey Publishers. ISBN 978-0-89789-167-7.
  17. 17.0 17.1
  18. 18.0 18.1 Cunningham MR, Roberts AR, Barbee AP, Druen PB, Wu CH (1995). "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 68 (2): 261–79. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261. S2CID 27778786.
  21. 21.0 21.1
  26. Cartwright, M. J., Kurumety, U. R., Nelson, C. C., Frueh, B. R., & Musch, D. C. (1994). Measurements of Upper Eyelid and Eyebrow Dimensions in Healthy White Individuals. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 117(2), 231–234. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73081-8
  32. Nedungadi, T. P., & Clegg, D. J. (2009). Sexual dimorphism in body fat distribution and risk for cardiovascular diseases. Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2(3), 321-327.
  43. Sforza C, Laino A, D'Alessio R, Grandi G, Binelli M, Ferrario VF (January 2009). "Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive Italian women as compared to normal women".
  48. 48.0 48.1
  53. p. 231-240
  54. Kenrick, D.T., Keefe, R.C., Gabrielidis, C., & Cornelius, J.S. 1996. Adolescents’ age preferences for dating partners: Support for an evolutionary model of life-history strategies. Child Development, 67, 1499-1511.
  56. Jones, D. (1996). Physical attractiveness and the theory of sexual selection: Results from five populations (Vol. 90). University of Michigan Museum.
  57.,5 See section "Male Tolerance"



Looks theoryLooksRegression toward the meanBeautyGolden RatioDecileFacial Aesthetics: Concepts and Clinical DiagnosisThe WallScientific BlackpillPhysiognomyBody dysmorphic disorderCheerleader effectGaitSchluby Hubby

Lookism communities (defunct)


GymmaxxingHeightmaxxingStatusmaxxingMoneymaxxingSurgerymaxxingWhitemaxxingAnabolic steroidsHGHSARMsJelqing

Looks levels

ChadChadliteBradGigachadTannerPretty BoyBeckyStacyMegastacyGigastacyWitch


EthnicelJBW theoryRicecelCurrycelBlackcelArabcelWhitecel



Body Parts

EyesBulging eyesLateral orbital rimLipsLower thirdMandibleMaxillaEyebrowMoustacheBoobsButtocksLeggingsFeetBrowridgeCheeksPenisBonepressedVagina

Body Characteristics

MacrophallismMidface ratioNeotenySexual attractivenessSexual dimorphismFacial Aesthetics: Concepts and Clinical DiagnosisFashionAntefaceFiveheadFrameFacial width-to-height ratioChinCanthal tiltCompact midfaceDeep-set eyesHunter eyesFacial masculinityFacial asymmetryBody attractiveness



GameSignaling theoryRomanceCourtshipNeggingSexual market valueBeautyCharismaOrbiterBullyingLMSPUAAssholeTalk therapyIndicator of interestDominance hierarchyFuck-off signalsSocial circleSlayerNeurolinguistic programmingOffline datingBragging


NeurotypicalCoolCharismaStoicAssholeDark triadNice guySimpApproach anxietyButterflies in the stomachConfidenceShynessLove shyAsperger's SyndromeSocial awkwardnessIQRationality

Pick Up Artists

Ross Jeffriesr/TRPReal Social DynamicsRooshVOwen CookPlayer SupremeWinston WuList of people in the seduction community


HypergamyCopulationCasual sexPump and dumpPromiscuityCock carouselRapeSexual harassmentBodyguard hypothesisBetabuxMarriage proposalReproductive successSexual envySex driveBateman's principleSexual economics theoryResources for orgasmsSex ratioFemale passivitySexual attractionAttraction ambiguity problemBody attractivenessFemale orgasmHuman penisSexual conflictSlutWhoreLordosisLeggingsPaternity assuranceMicrochimerismFeminine imperativePussy cartelRejectionAdverse effects of inceldomMaslow's hierarchy of needsHomosexualityHomocel hypothesisDemographics of inceldomPolygynyPolyandryMonogamyMarriageTraditionalist conservatismMate guardingMate poachingMate choice copyingIntrasexual competitionFacial masculinityNeotenyFisherian runawayCreepinessValidation

Other theories

Timeless quotes on womenFemales are socially ineptWomen-are-wonderful effectGynocentrismMatthew effectApex fallacyClown worldFeminismSexual revolutionFemale subordinationFemale hypoagencyFemale solipsismPrincess syndromeLife on tutorial modeFemale privilegeFake depressionFemale sneakinessFemme fataleBriffault's lawJuggernaut lawHalo effectVariability hypothesisPsychiatryAntifragilityTriggeredLife historyScientific BlackpillScientific Blackpill (Supplemental)Evolutionary mismatchMutationBehavioral sinkPolitical correctness‎Affirmative actionVirtue signalingEugenicsEnvironmentalismMale scarcityRegression toward the mean



Biological essentialismEugenicsAnti-EnvironmentalismTraditionalist conservatismFatalismBlackpillScientific BlackpillScientific Blackpill (Supplemental)Behavioral sinkHypergamyMatthew effectBeautyNeotenyFisherian runawayGood genes hypothesisDominance hierarchyIntrasexual competitionJ. D. UnwinSexual sublimationFemale subordinationOnline datingPhysiognomyPersonality


SlutMonogamyMarriageArranged marriagePolygynyPolyandry



BlackpillRacepillHeightpillDickpillBaldpillShitpillDogpillBirdpillTeen love pill

It's over

Cope or ropeCopeRopingLay down and rotInbreeding depressionOutbreeding depressionMutationSocial epistasis amplification modelAtavismReproductive successDemographics of inceldomCauses of inceldomAdverse effects of inceldomEvolutionary mismatchBehavioral sinkRegression toward the meanPeaked in high schoolFOMOSexual envy