The dogpill is a theory that suggests that some human females prefer sex with dogs or other Canids over sex with incels. Some more extreme dogpillers claim that women would prefer sex with a dog over even chads.
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Fantasies[edit | edit source]
The most persuasive evidence for the dogpill comes from internet forums. There are, in fact, more internet forums with women fantasizing about sex with dogs than there are forums dedicated to women lusting after male virgins. To our best knowledge, no forum of the latter kind exists. This is supported by the fact that women report finding male virgins sexually less attractive than partnered men.
There is also a sizeable underground cottage industry of zoophilic pornography involving films depicting female actresses engaging in sexual activities with dogs (including amateur films). The most famous actress who starred in one of these films was "Linda Lovelace," also starring in the infamous 1970s pornographic film "Deep Throat." She claimed to have been coerced at gunpoint while filming her pornographic movies. This is despite the possession, distribution, and production of such materials being illegal in many jurisdictions. Related to this, a 2011 Italian study on the pornography viewing habits of young adults documented that 16.5% of female pornography consumers reported that they had recently watched pornography involving sex with animals. This corresponded to roughly 10% of the female sample in total, who reported "currently" watching bestiality porn.
In 1973, author Nancy Friday published a famous book on female sexuality titled "My Secret Garden: Women's Sexual Fantasies" that luridly detailed women's deepest sexual fantasies. The book has been dubbed the "innocent dawning of what later became known as the sex-positive feminist movement". The book was infamous for including several highly graphic female fantasies that pertained to the practice of bestiality, "primarily with dogs."
Dickpill[edit | edit source]
Many breeds of dogs have a much larger penis than an average human male, thus making the dogpill concomitant with the dickpill. This may explain the large worldwide market for replica dog dildos, with one of the major sites selling these products being the 18,622nd most popular site in the United States and 33,328th most popular website worldwide in terms of internet traffic. Corroborating this, studies have documented that women gain sexual gratification from inserting all kinds of objects, sometimes as large as "soda cans", into their vaginal orifices. It would certainly not be out of the ordinary for women to get horny for other unusual, possibly living objects (just not you).
Data from Google Trends suggest that there was roughly equivalent search volume for the phrase 'dog dildo' as there was for the search term 'realistic dildo'  from 2004 to the present. Disturbingly, one of the related queries displayed by Google for the search term 'dog dildo' was the term 'large dog breeds'. This suggests the women who are purchasing these dildos are also interested in practicing 'the real thing', with an actual "Canid".
Genital arousal[edit | edit source]
More evidence for the dogpill may be that women's genitals are naturally stimulated by zoophilic pornography, whereas men's genitals are not. Meredith Chivers, PhD., an assistant professor of psychology at Queens University in Kingston, conducted an experiment proving that women were aroused by all images of animal coupling they were exposed to: including e.g., Bonobos. Though, it has been argued that this may represent an evolutionary adaption for women to produce vaginal secretions readily in response to sexual stimuli, to prevent tissue damage from coerced sex, etc.
Surveys[edit | edit source]
Alfred Kinsey, the infamous human sexuality researcher, conducted a survey in the 1950s that examined the prevalence of bestiality. It was found that 3.6 percent of adult females sampled confessed to having engaged in such sexual acts after their adolescent period. The fifties were more socially conservative, and thus an even higher figure may be expected in the contemporary, sexually liberated West. Dog ownership has also only increased since the fifties. Moreover, self-reported surveys attempting to determine the prevalence of zoophilic sexual activities most likely suffer from a severe bias in that respondents underreport such deviant sexual behavior.
A subsequent study of "highly intelligent women" conducted in 1974 by psychologist Manfred F. DeMartino found that 7 percent of the sample admitted to having engaged in various forms of sexual activity with animals, primarily with dogs. The author concluded that due to the figure being higher than in the previous study by Kinsey et al. (1953), more intelligent women may be more prone to engaging in such acts (presumably because openness to new experience correlates with IQ).
WSU research showed that across 144 cultures, dogs that interacted with women were 220% more likely to be treated like people and women more likely have a dog sleeping alongside them than men, challenging the notion of dogs being men's 'best friend', but rather women's.
Miletski (2002) reported that 87% of males and 100% of females who reported any sexual contacts with animals reported dogs as their non-human sexual partner. Further, both Beetz (cited in Beetz 2005) and Williams and Weinberg (2003) reported dogs as the primary sexually used animals. This may in part be explained by the fact that most other pet's sexual organs are incompatible in dimensions and that dogs spontaneously engage in humping or mounting behavior more often than other pets.
Most studies into the subject have found that men admit to engaging in zoophilic acts more often than women, e.g., in 1974 Morton M. Hunt estimated the prevalence higher among men than women (4.9% vs 1.9%, p < 0.001). However, it is known that women generally lie about their sexual behavior and underreport their number of past sexual partners. In fact, throughout human history and across cultures, one observes the tendency for women's sexual behavior to be heavily controlled to ensure their paternity, so women are likely still under social pressures encouraging chastity and obedience in women which may cause such a bias. By admitting to deviant sexuality, women also risk being subject to fierce gossip by other women. Moreover, it can be argued that men frequently perform zoophilic acts out of desperation (because of males much higher libido). Conversely, due to women's lower libido on average as compared to men and their typical ease of finding a willing sexual partner, it can be argued that women perform these acts more often solely due to zoophilic preferences.
Even though these figures might sound low, people have, on average 600 acquaintances, so it is almost certain that everyone has encountered at least one female who has had sexual intercourse with a dog. Since only 44% of U.S. citizens own a dog, the prevalence of such sex acts is likely around twice as high among dog owners.
Psychological Theories for Dogpilling[edit | edit source]
MemeAnalysis once made a video proclaiming that slime toys and sponge are made to replace absence of tactile play and erotic reality in the digitized "post"-modern era (slime being mud, and sponge being breasts). In the same vein, it could be said that a large portion of women have missed the "real thing", and are compensating with sex toys and animals, including the Dogpill and even the "Maggotpill" (see "BlowFly Girl"). Slavoj Zizek gave similar ideas in The Desert of the Real that ultimately, Post-modernism itself (in this case feminists detachment from men) will make people commit acts of controlled self-harm to return to pre-modern times (Zoophilia).
To demonstrate the validity of this, is to check:
- the historical rate of sexual proactiveness and sexual access of males, compared to the present
- The correlation between bestiality, other fetishes, and their ties to either socio-economic status or adverse childhood events
Secret language[edit | edit source]
Femoids have a special language to describe intimacy with dogs. For example, intercourse with dogs many femoids call "knotting". This refers to an Canid phallus containing a "knot" i.e., the "bulbis glandis" at the base, which inflates when the beast is sexually aroused, causing it to become locked or "tied" to a female canid (or female human zoophile) thus ensuring the proper deposition of semen into the vagina. Most women will get aroused reading this.
Some dogpill theorists have also maintained that women or girls who have decorated themselves with dogs' paw tattoos use it as a secret code to communicate their perversions to fellow zoophiles (similar to the "ace of spades" brand used by coalburners.)
If one is perceptive, you can see that they often have this tattoo where a dog would latch on with its front paws during intercourse. You decide for yourself the validity of this hypothesis.
Derived terms like "knotty" are homonyms with "naughty" so listen carefully.
Origin[edit | edit source]
Pre-modernity[edit | edit source]
It could be argued that the first dogpill theorist was the Ancient Greek historian Herodotus, who wrote at length in his famous "histories" about the supposed penchant of Pharaonic Egyptian women for engaging in acts of bestiality with a menagerie of animals, including dogs. The Qing dynasty era Chinese author Pu Songling wrote a book about the subject, with the English translation of the title of the book being "The Fornicating Dog". In the work, a traveling businessman is cuckolded and (eventually) murdered by the family dog. After word of the wife's scandalous relationship with the animal spreads, she and the dog are sentenced to death by lingchi (slow slicing, or the infamous 'death by a thousand cuts'), but not before the couple is forced to copulate in public.
Modern era to current age[edit | edit source]
Otto Weininger, in his opus "Sex and Character" claimed that zoophilia in women was explained by them being existentially closer to animals than men are, stating: "As a matter of fact, women are sisters of the flowers, and are in close relationship with the animals. Many of their sexual perversities and affections for animals indicate this."
A Hollywood film has been produced on the subject.
The concept has leaked into the popular consciousness in recent years. It is difficult to determine how or why the dogpill grew in notoriety outside of the incelosphere, but the popularity of the concept on semi-fringe internet spaces that often influence mainstream internet culture, such as 4chan, is likely one of the primary reasons. The prominent 'breadtuber', VaushV, wrote an essay on the topic.
Dogpill gallery[edit | edit source]
Emergency room personnel are sometimes the only people to bear witness to the fact that a zoophilic act has occurred.
White Girls Fuck Dogs[edit | edit source]
Timeline[edit | edit source]
2013[edit | edit source]
2019[edit | edit source]
- Former model to ‘marry’ her dog after giving up on men following 220 failed dates
- A former director of the United Nations Population Division recommends women to get a dog rather than marrying
[edit | edit source]
- /r/dogpillscience (a forum dedicated to scientific studies and web articles pertaining to the dogpill)
See also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0093691X13001052 Bulbus glandis + Pars longa glandis is 17.4±1.19 cm compared to human 13.12±1.66 cm, i.e., about 30% longer across a variety of breeds, with the average being longer than 97.6% of men
- Alfred CK, Pomeroy W, Martin C, Gebhard P. 1953. "Sexual behavior in the human female" Pt. 2: "Animal Contacts." Institute for Sex Research. WB Sanders Company. [Abstract]