Women, upon hearing this as a criticism, blame incels for racial discrimination against other species.
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Fantasies[edit | edit source]
The strongest evidence for the dogpill comes from internet forums. There are, in fact, more internet forums with women fantasizing about sex with dogs than there are forums dedicated to women lusting after male virgins. To our best knowledge, in fact, no forum of the latter kind exists. This is supported by the fact that women report finding male virgins sexually less attractive than partnered men.
There is also a large underground cottage industry of zoophilic pornography, involving films being produced depicting female actresses engaging in sexual activities with dogs (including amateur films), with the most famous actress being Linda Lovelace, also starring in the infamous 1970s pornographic film Deep Throat. She claimed to have been coerced at gunpoint during the filming of her pornographic movies. This is despite the the fact that the possession, distribution and production of such materials is illegal in many jurisdictions. Related to this, a 2011 Italian study on the pornography viewing habits of young adults documented that 16.5% of female pornography consumers reported that they had recently watched pornography involving sex with animals. This corresponded to roughly 10% of the female sample in total, who reported "currently" watching bestiality porn.
In 1973, author Nancy Friday published a famous book on female sexuality titled "My Secret Garden: Women’s Sexual Fantasies" that luridly detailed women's deepest sexual fantasies. The book has been dubbed the "innocent dawning of what later became known as the sex-positive feminist movement". The book was infamous for including several highly graphic female fantasies that pertained to the practice of bestiality, primarily with dogs.
Dickpill[edit | edit source]
Many breeds of dogs have a much larger penis than an average human male, thus making the dogpill concomitant with the dickpill. This may explain the large worldwide market for replica dog dildos, with one of the major sites selling these products being the 18,622th most popular site in the United States and 33,328th most popular site worldwide in terms of internet traffic. Corroborating this, studies have documented that women gain sexual gratification from inserting all kinds of objects, sometimes as large as soda cans, into their vaginal orifices, so it would not be out of the ordinary for women to get horny for other unusual, possibly living objects (just not you).
Data from Google Trends suggest that there was roughly equivalent search volume for the phrase 'dog dildo' as there was for the search term 'realistic dildo' from 2004 to the present. Disturbingly, one of related queries displayed by Google for the search term 'dog dildo' was the term 'large dog breeds'. This could be seen as some evidence that the women who are purchasing these dildos are also interested in practicing 'the real thing', with an actual Canid.
Genital arousal[edit | edit source]
More evidence for the dogpill may be that women's genitals are naturally stimulated by zoophilic pornography whereas men's genitals are not. This was measured and confirmed by Meredith Chivers, PhD., an assistant professor of psychology at Queens University in Kingston. This included all images of animal coupling they were exposed to: including e.g. Bonobos. Though, it has been argued that this may represent an evolutionary adaption for women to produce vaginal secretions readily in response to sexual stimuli, in order to prevent tissue damage from coerced sex etc.
Surveys[edit | edit source]
Alfred Kinsey, the infamous human sexuality researcher, conducted a survey in the 1950s that examined the prevalence of bestiality. It was found that 3.6 percent of adult females sampled confessed to having engaged in such sexual acts after their adolescent period. The fifties were more socially conservative and thus an even higher figure may be expected in the contemporary, sexually liberated West. Dog ownership has also only increased since the fifties. Moreover, self-reported surveys attempting to determine the prevalence of zoophilic sexual activities most likely suffer from a severe bias in that respondents underreport such deviant sexual behavior.
A subsequent study of "highly intelligent women" conducted in 1974 by psychologist Manfred F. DeMartino found that 7 percent of the sample admitted to having engaged in various forms of sexual activity with animals, primarily with dogs. The author concluded that, due to the figure being higher than in the previous study by Kinsey et al. (1953), more intelligent women may be more prone to engaging in such acts (presumably because openness to new experience correlates with IQ).
In addition, Miletski (2002) reported that 87% of males and 100% of females who reported any sexual contacts with animals reported dogs as their non-human sexual partner. Further, both Beetz (cited in Beetz 2005) and Williams and Weinberg (2003) reported dogs as the primary sexually used animals. This may in part be explained by the fact that most other pet's sexual organs are incompatible in dimensions and that dogs spontaneously engage in humping or mounting behavior more often than other pets.
Most studies into the subject have found that men admit to engaging in zoophilic acts more often than women, e.g. in 1974 Morton M. Hunt estimated the prevalence higher among men than women (4.9% vs 1.9%, p < 0.001). However, it is known that women generally lie about their sexual behavior and underreport their number of past sexual partners. In fact, throughout human history and across cultures, one observes the tendency for women's sexual behavior to be heavily controlled for the purpose of paternity assurance, so women are likely still under social pressures encouraging chastity and obedience in women which may cause such a bias. By admitting to deviant sexuality, women also risk being subject to fierce gossip by other women. Moreover, it can be argued that men frequently perform zoophilic acts out of desperation (because of males much higher libido). Conversely, due to women's lower libido on average as compared to men and their typical ease of finding a willing sexual partner, it can be argued that women perform these acts more often solely due to zoophilic preferences.
Even though these figures might sound low, people have on average 600 acquaintances, so it is almost certain that everyone has encountered at least one female who has had sexual intercourse with a dog. Since only 44% of U.S. citizens own a dog, the prevalence of such sex acts is likely around twice as high among dog owners.
Secret language[edit | edit source]
Femoids have a special language to describe intimacy with dogs. For example, intercourse with dogs many femoids call "knotting". This refers to an Canid phallus containing a "knot" i.e the bulbis glandis at the base, which inflates when the beast is sexually aroused, causing it to become locked or "tied" to a female canid (or female human zoophile) thus ensuring the proper deposition of semen into the vagina. Most women will get aroused reading this.
It has also been maintained by some dogpill theorists that women or girls who have decorated themselves with dog's paw tattoos are using this as a secret code to communicate their perversions to fellow zoophiles (similar to the "ace of spades" brand used by coalburners.)
If one is perceptive, you can see that they often have this tattoo where a dog would latch on with its front paws during intercourse. You decide for yourself the validity of this hypothesis.
Origin[edit | edit source]
It could be argued that the first dogpill theorist was the Ancient Greek historian Herodotus, who wrote at length in his famous histories about the supposed penchant of Pharonic Egyptian women for engaging in acts of bestiality with a menagerie of animals, including dogs. The Qing dynasty era Chinese author Pu Songling wrote a book about the subject, with the English translation of the title of the book being "The Fornicating Dog". In the work, a travelling businessman is cuckolded and (eventually) murdered by the family dog. After word of the wife's scandalous relationship with the animal spreads, she and the dog are sentenced to death by lingchi (slow slicing, or the infamous 'death by a thousand cuts'), but not before the couple is forced to copulate in public.
Otto Weininger, in his opus Sex and Character claimed that zoophilia in women was explained by them being existentially closer to animals than men are, stating: "As a matter of fact, women are sisters of the flowers, and are in close relationship with the animals. Many of their sexual perversities and affections for animals indicate this."
A Hollywood film has been produced on the subject.
Dogpill gallery[edit | edit source]
Emergency room personnel are sometimes the only people to bear witness to the fact that a zoophilic act has occurred.
References[edit | edit source]
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0093691X13001052 Bulbus glanis + Pars longa glandis is 17.4±1.19 cm compared to human 13.12±1.66 cm, i.e. about 30% longer across a variety of breeds, with the average being longer than 97.6% of men
- Alfred CK, Pomeroy W, Martin C, Gebhard P. 1953. Sexual behavior in the human female Pt. 2: Animal Contacts. Institute for Sex Research. WB Sanders Company. [Abstract]
[edit | edit source]
- /r/dogpillscience (a forum dedicated to scientific studies and web articles pertaining to the dogpill)
See also[edit | edit source]
Biological essentialism • Eugenics • Anti-Environmentalism • Traditional conservatism • Fatalism • Blackpill • Scientific Blackpill • Scientific Blackpill (Supplemental) • Behavioral sink • Hypergamy • Matthew effect • Beauty • Fisherian runaway • Dominance hierarchy • Intrasexual competition • J. D. Unwin • Sexual sublimation • Female subordination • Online dating • Physiognomy • Personality
Cope or rope • Cope • Lay down and rot • Inbreeding depression • Outbreeding depression • Mutation • Atavism • Reproductive success • Demographics of inceldom • Causes of inceldom • Adverse effects of inceldom • Evolutionary mismatch • Behavioral sink