Omega male

From Incel Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

An omega male is a mancel who is at the very bottom of the social totem pole as far as access to mating, sex, money, and other things distributed unevenly in society. This social ineptitude usually extends to almost all areas of his life, including his sexual prowess. The social ineptitude of an omega male usually stems from the fact that he has no confidence in himself as a sexual being, and thus has to rely on external sources of confidence for such purposes.

Omegaverse and Omega Male Fetishism[edit | edit source]

The Omegaverse fandom, created by Tumblr and Femcel, is a mythos where the Dominance Hierarchy has been reconstructed such that male-male (homosexual, "yaoi" or "bara") relationships can work biologically. The Alphas are redefined as "tops" (proactive), and the Omegas are redefined as "bottoms" (receptive). It is said that it is partially a sexual perversion (rather than a parody) of the Dominance Hierarchy, it attempted to fetishize the Omega with certain social traits.[1]

  1. discriminated for weakness and femininity (Framecel and Cutecel)
  2. prone to monthly "ovulation" (Nymphocel as a side effect of Bipolar Disorder and/or BPD)
  3. are required to be put on regular medication (Anti-Psychotics for Mentalcel)
  4. emergency medical injections that can cause dizziness (see No.3)
  5. requires work subsidies (Mentalcel often are half as productive as normies[1])
  6. marriage discrimination and social registration (Incel stigma)
  7. physical abuse/marking by Alphas (resembles Mogging)

However, they painted a silhouette that is only a subset of potential incels. Uglycel, Fatcel/Gymcel and Colored Ethnicel are often excluded from this archetype. However, putting these characteristics together forms the diametric opposite, the "ugly bastard" (which is a degradation trope).

Realistically, there are no explanation as to why these peoples would want this type of person, while at the same time not wanting to have sex with such persons. One theory is that sexual "bottoms" have the same biological markers as intellectuals, artists, strict monogamists and religious fundamentalists (Stress-Tolerant, Long Life History and K-Selected), and that these liberal-oriented masculinized feminists wanted to literally "stick it to the man" (Butch lesbians are more likely to be dominant/aggressive[2] and prenatally masculinized[3][4]). This runs in counter to prenatal factors being an assortative mechanism[5].

See also[edit | edit source]