Wheat Waffle's Attraction Scale

Wheat Waffles' Three Tier Theory

Wheat Waffles' Three Tier Theory divides men into three coarse tiers: Chads, Normies, and Subfives. This tier system is proposed in his video as an alternative to the Decile scale, due to the fact that females are more likely to inflate the score by 2-3 points for "virtue signaling" (Platitude) and threat avoidance purposes.^{[citation needed]} The concept of male-female rating deviations has ben reaffirmed though aggregation of multiple rating data. some data can be considered based on Indicator of interest and Fuck-off signals.

The table below shows typical female reactions to a male in each tier:

	Chads	Normies	"SUBFIVE"
Emotion (Russell)	High Arousal and Positive Valence	Low Arousal and Positive Valence, or Neutral Valence	High Arousal, Negative or Neutral Valence
Emotion(Bradley)	Appetitive Motivation	Low Arousal, Neutral Valence/Pleasure	Defensive Motivation
Example	Happy, Surprised	Neutral, Relaxed	Disgust, Anger
Physical	Accentuation of Beauty	(None)	Misaligned Foot, Head or Naval
Psychological	Female Desiring Skin Contact	Soft Rejections	Arms Close to Body
Proxemics	Close or Reducing Distance	Stable Distance	Far or Increased Distance
Traits	Negatives as Positives (Halo effect)	Meritocratic	Positives as Negatives (Failo effect)

Wheat Waffles' Exponential Attraction Theory

His other idea is that when the decile scale is correctly calibrated, the match rate becomes exponential. An equation can be derived from his scaling factor to give resolution to values. His Theory coincides with Tinder researches However this rating system puts 4s, which should be by name "Subfive", to be a Normie.

Decile	9	8	7	6	5	4	3	2	1	EQUATION
1 in X chance of matching (WW Estimate)	3	5.5	10	19	34	61	110	200	370	3*(SQRT(10/3))^(9-RATING)
WW Naming Scheme	Chad	Chad	Chadlite	Normie (Brad)	Normie (Tanner)	Normie (Melvin)	Subfive	Subfive	Subfive
Top Percentile of Attractiveness	1.25th	2.5th	5th	10th	20th	30th	55th	65th	80th	10*SQRT(5/3)^(10-RATING)-14.5 Estimation, See 80/20 Rule

Clarification on Proxemics and Skin Contact

The problem with his idea is that it is not quantifiable. In order to reduce this problem, Proxemics of skin contact and social distance can be used as an effective tool, and that their naming scheme can be matched well.

Proxemics	Intimate Space	Personal Space	Social Space	Public Space
Distance	under 1.5ft or 0.45m	1.5~4ft or 0.45~1.2m	4~12ft or 1.2~3.7m	over 12ft or 3.7m
Roles (Hall)	Partner	Friends & Family	Acquaintance & Extended Family	Strangers
Dunbar's Definition	Ego Support Clique (Kin)	Sympathy Group (Superfamily) Affinity Group (Band)	Active Network (Clan) Acquaintance (Megaband)	Memorable Faces (Tribe)
Casual Naming	Boyfriend Intimate Friends or "OG"s	Anytime Friends or Close Friends Party Friends or Good Friends	"Casual" Friends (Wedding/Funeral) Frenemies or Acquaintances	"Faces" or Strangers
Allowed (Hall)	Palms, Arms, Face, Torso/Legs, or Chest/Groin	Palms, Arms, or Face	Palms	N/A
Occasion (Hall)	N/A	Torso/Legs	Arms	N/A
Never (Hall)	N/A	Chest/Groin	Face, Torso/Legs, or Chest/Groin	Palms, Arms, Face, Torso/Legs, or Chest/Groin
Rating Estimation	"Chad"	"Normie"	Upper "Subfive"	Lower "Subfive"

Possible Critiques

The claim that "there is a leap in numbers" implies that either the theory of exponential attractiveness is not "smooth", or the accuracy of match rate measures decreases as it reaches the extremes, following a more sigmoidal pattern. The only other explanation that can explain this phenomenon is that either there is a "cap" (truncation) on maximum fitness.