Wheat Waffle's Attraction Scale

From Incel Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wheat Waffles' Three Tier Theory[edit | edit source]

Wheat Waffles has made a video[1] on an alternative to the Decile scale, due to the fact that females are more likely to inflate the score by 2-3 points for "virtue signaling" (Platitude) and threat avoidance purposes. The concept of male-female rating deviations has ben reaffirmed though aggregation of multiple rating data.[2] some data can be considered based on Indicator of interest and Fuck-off signals.

To reiterate on his observations table, see info below

Chads Normies "SUBFIVE"
Emotion (Russell)[3] High Arousal and Positive Valence Low Arousal and Positive Valence, or Neutral Valence High Arousal, Negative or Neutral Valence
Emotion(Bradley)[4] Appetitive Motivation Low Arousal, Neutral Valence/Pleasure Defensive Motivation
Example Happy, Surprised Neutral, Relaxed Disgust, Anger
Physical Accentuation of Beauty (None) Misaligned Foot, Head or Naval
Psychological Female Desiring Skin Contact Soft Rejections Arms Close to Body
Proxemics Close or Reducing Distance Stable Distance Far or Increased Distance
Traits Negatives as Positives (Halo effect) Meritocratic Positives as Negatives (Failo effect)

Wheat Waffles' Exponential Attraction Theory[edit | edit source]

His other idea is that when the decile scale is correctly calibrated, the match rate becomes exponential. An equation can be derived from his scaling factor to give resolution to values. His Theory coincides with Tinder researches[5][6][7] However this rating system puts 4s, which should be by name "Subfive", to be a Normie.

Decile 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EQUATION
1 in X chance of matching (WW Estimate)[8] 3 5.5 10 19 34 61 110 200 370 3*(SQRT(10/3))^(9-RATING)
WW Naming Scheme Chad Chad Chadlite Normie (Brad) Normie (Tanner) Normie (Melvin) Subfive Subfive Subfive
Top Percentile of Attractiveness[9] 1.25th 2.5th 5th 10th 20th 30th 55th 65th 80th 10*SQRT(5/3)^(10-RATING)-14.5

Estimation, See 80/20 Rule

Clarification on Proxemics and Skin Contact[edit | edit source]

The problem with his idea is that it is not quantifiable. In order to reduce this problem, Proxemics of skin contact[10] and social distance[11] can be used as an effective tool, and that their naming scheme can be matched well.

Proxemics Intimate Space Personal Space Social Space Public Space
Distance[11] under 1.5ft or 0.45m 1.5~4ft or 0.45~1.2m 4~12ft or 1.2~3.7m over 12ft or 3.7m
Roles (Hall)[10] Partner Friends & Family Acquaintance & Extended Family Strangers
Dunbar's Definition Ego

Support Clique (Kin)

Sympathy Group (Superfamily)

Affinity Group (Band)

Active Network (Clan)

Acquaintance (Megaband)

Memorable Faces (Tribe)
Casual Naming[12][13] Boyfriend

Intimate Friends or "OG"s

Anytime Friends or Close Friends

Party Friends or Good Friends

"Casual" Friends (Wedding/Funeral)

Frenemies or Acquaintances

"Faces" or Strangers
Allowed (Hall)[10] Palms, Arms, Face, Torso/Legs, or Chest/Groin Palms, Arms, or Face Palms N/A
Occasion (Hall)[10] N/A Torso/Legs Arms N/A
Never (Hall)[10] N/A Chest/Groin Face, Torso/Legs, or Chest/Groin Palms, Arms, Face, Torso/Legs, or Chest/Groin
Rating Estimation "Chad" "Normie" Upper "Subfive" Lower "Subfive"

Possible Critiques[edit | edit source]

The claim that "there is a leap in numbers" implies that either the theory of exponential attractiveness is not "smooth", or the accuracy of match rate measures decreases as it reaches the extremes, following a more sigmoidal pattern. The only other explanation that can explain this phenomenon is that either there is a "cap" (truncation) on maximum fitness.

See Also[edit | edit source]