Talk:Mewing: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
253 bytes added ,  31 December 2019
Line 48: Line 48:


:::: Impressive is entirely subjective. The author may find a 0.25 or even a 0.50 point increase on the decile without surgery as impressive. Also none of the acedemics use the term mewing, instead they use the term tongue posture. Also on an unrelated note found an obscure study on a more attractive facial profile being correlated with getting hired for a job. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484273/
:::: Impressive is entirely subjective. The author may find a 0.25 or even a 0.50 point increase on the decile without surgery as impressive. Also none of the acedemics use the term mewing, instead they use the term tongue posture. Also on an unrelated note found an obscure study on a more attractive facial profile being correlated with getting hired for a job. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484273/
::::: Still, even if there is a .5 increase, it wouldn't be that costly to conduct such a study as it involves almost no material. Different from, say, a surgical method. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 04:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)


== Weird findings ==
== Weird findings ==
Despite mixed anecdotes and controversy on facial aesthetics. There's way more uncontested anecdotal evidence for mewing greatly improving voice/singing quality. What do you guys think of this? [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 03:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Despite mixed anecdotes and controversy on facial aesthetics. There's way more uncontested anecdotal evidence for mewing greatly improving voice/singing quality. What do you guys think of this? [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 03:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
17,538

edits

Navigation menu