Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Talk:Mewing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→The biggest red flag: new section
(→The biggest red flag: new section) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Full quote "Although Mew's theory does generate some plausible conclusions that can aid our profession in developing future surgical procedures, the public needs to be made aware that it is not based on sound scientific evidence that would make it a viable alternative treatment to orthognathic surgery." Meaning there is no scientific evidence for mewing being a better alternative to surgical correction. [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 21:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC) | Full quote "Although Mew's theory does generate some plausible conclusions that can aid our profession in developing future surgical procedures, the public needs to be made aware that it is not based on sound scientific evidence that would make it a viable alternative treatment to orthognathic surgery." Meaning there is no scientific evidence for mewing being a better alternative to surgical correction. [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 21:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
== The biggest red flag == | |||
is imo that dr. mew, to my (admittedly superficial) knowledge, has not done a proper scientific testing of the mewing method. It is a dirt cheap method should (literally no cost) so it should be extremely easy to test in an experiment. In the "Jaws" book there are examples dating back to 2014 which showed impressive results only after 6 months. So, why is there no solid science, if it is supposedly so effective? People have also raised this argument on reddit, hence why I linked to the reddit threads such that people can see some common pro/contra arguments [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 00:29, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | |||