Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Talk:Virgin vs. Chad: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
:::Only commenting on one of your links because all of them are essentially the same meme: twitter.com/jackson_m4v/status/1194831763127726080 <- this juxtaposes "pirating" as chad and "not pirating" as virgin to basically say that those who oppose pirating don't have balls. so is using people's suffering in jokes insensitive? yes. is it malintentioned towards virgins? possibly, but i'd argue more likely it's simply a crude joke to get more attention. even a certified psychologist who wrote a bunch of pro-incel blog posts used the meme this way: https://slatestarcodex.com/2018/12/03/book-review-evolutionary-psychopathology/ i think IT also often posts this stuff to make fun of how incels care so much about virginity. this is, at least, what i've often seen in the comments. i'm disinclined to complain about this because people are way too sensitive already. complaining about this only gives anti-incels a free pass to complain about insensitive speech in incel communities [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 03:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | :::Only commenting on one of your links because all of them are essentially the same meme: twitter.com/jackson_m4v/status/1194831763127726080 <- this juxtaposes "pirating" as chad and "not pirating" as virgin to basically say that those who oppose pirating don't have balls. so is using people's suffering in jokes insensitive? yes. is it malintentioned towards virgins? possibly, but i'd argue more likely it's simply a crude joke to get more attention. even a certified psychologist who wrote a bunch of pro-incel blog posts used the meme this way: https://slatestarcodex.com/2018/12/03/book-review-evolutionary-psychopathology/ i think IT also often posts this stuff to make fun of how incels care so much about virginity. this is, at least, what i've often seen in the comments. i'm disinclined to complain about this because people are way too sensitive already. complaining about this only gives anti-incels a free pass to complain about insensitive speech in incel communities [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 03:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
::::I really don't care how sensitive incels are about being made fun of. I just care when they are being made fun of in an unhelpful way. Men are allegedly given space to be sensitive. If feminists make fun of incels for being sensitive, that makes them look bad, not incels. As feminists claim to care about men sharing their feelings. If you wish to add disagreement in the article you are free to do so[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 03:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | ::::I really don't care how sensitive incels are about being made fun of. I just care when they are being made fun of in an unhelpful way. Men are allegedly given space to be sensitive. If feminists make fun of incels for being sensitive, that makes them look bad, not incels. As feminists claim to care about men sharing their feelings. If you wish to add disagreement in the article you are free to do so[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 03:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::::"As feminists claim to care about men sharing their feelings." right, but this is possibly an unattainable goal anyhow and one borne out of female solipsism and virtue signaling rather than rational/realistic thought. i don't know for sure, but my hunch is men would not even feel better if admitted more sensitivity because it does not feel earned. human cognition and emotion is all about earning things (and about looks and charisma) [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 04:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||