6,353
edits
Alex Undersky: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→'Incomplete Sexual Revolution'
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
However, Undersky further advances this line of argumentation by portraying women as asset-holding capitalists rather than essentially passive victims of the capitalist system of exchange and production, like the aforementioned book's female author— which is in line with the typical orthodox Marxist treatment of social phenomena that involves the exchange of [[orgasms for resources|sex for resources]]. | However, Undersky further advances this line of argumentation by portraying women as asset-holding capitalists rather than essentially passive victims of the capitalist system of exchange and production, like the aforementioned book's female author— which is in line with the typical orthodox Marxist treatment of social phenomena that involves the exchange of [[orgasms for resources|sex for resources]]. | ||
{{Quote| "The vagina is the private property of women [...] its owner (is) a capitalist, in this case - vaginocapitalist. Access to the vagina is the key to exploitation in the modern world".|Alex}} | {{Quote| "The vagina is the private property of women [...] its owner (is) a capitalist, in this case - vaginocapitalist. Access to the vagina is the key to exploitation in the modern world".|Alex}} | ||
===='Incomplete [[Sexual | ===='Incomplete [[Sexual revolution]]'==== | ||
Unlike the [[redpill]] or any of its derivative [[pill jargon|pills]] Alex views the sexual revolution of the 1960s favourably but believes it only lasted ten years and was then strangled by the capitalists and traditionalists, who instituted an "age of egoism". He believes the sexual revolution is not complete because women gained 100% access to sex, but men have lost that freedom which he claims existed in hippie cultures.<ref>https://vk.com/@leftantifem-politika#selection-231.263-239.89 [[https://archive.md/lN2Uf#selection-231.263-239.89 Archive.md]]</ref> | Unlike the [[redpill]] or any of its derivative [[pill jargon|pills]] Alex views the sexual revolution of the 1960s favourably but believes it only lasted ten years and was then strangled by the capitalists and traditionalists, who instituted an "age of egoism". He believes the sexual revolution is not complete because women gained 100% access to sex, but men have lost that freedom which he claims existed in hippie cultures.<ref>https://vk.com/@leftantifem-politika#selection-231.263-239.89 [[https://archive.md/lN2Uf#selection-231.263-239.89 Archive.md]]</ref> | ||