6,353
edits
Alex Undersky: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→"Incomplete Sexual Revolution"
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
However, Undersky further advances this line of argumentation by portraying women as asset-holding capitalists rather than essentially passive victims of the capitalist system of exchange and production, like the aforementioned book's female author— which is in line with the typical orthodox Marxist treatment of social phenomena that involves the exchange of [[orgasms for resources|sex for resources]]. | However, Undersky further advances this line of argumentation by portraying women as asset-holding capitalists rather than essentially passive victims of the capitalist system of exchange and production, like the aforementioned book's female author— which is in line with the typical orthodox Marxist treatment of social phenomena that involves the exchange of [[orgasms for resources|sex for resources]]. | ||
{{Quote| "The vagina is the private property of women [...] its owner (is) a capitalist, in this case - vaginocapitalist. Access to the vagina is the key to exploitation in the modern world".|Alex}} | {{Quote| "The vagina is the private property of women [...] its owner (is) a capitalist, in this case - vaginocapitalist. Access to the vagina is the key to exploitation in the modern world".|Alex}} | ||
==== | ===='Incomplete [[Sexual Revolution]]'==== | ||
Unlike the [[redpill]] or any of its derivative [[pill jargon|pills]] Alex views the | Unlike the [[redpill]] or any of its derivative [[pill jargon|pills]] Alex views the sexual revolution of the 1960s favourably but believes it only lasted ten years and was then strangled by the capitalists and traditionalists, who instituted an "age of egoism". He believes the sexual revolution is not complete because women gained 100% access to sex, but men have lost that freedom which he claims existed in hippie cultures.<ref>https://vk.com/@leftantifem-politika#selection-231.263-239.89 [[https://archive.md/lN2Uf#selection-231.263-239.89 Archive.md]]</ref> | ||
Alex thinks that sexual freedom is good, presumably because he thinks true sexual freedom would somehow eliminate the sexual 'market' or because he thinks that a completely promiscuous mating system (polygynandry) will still result in unselected males having more sex than under the current system, basically that a 'rising tide lifts all boats', in this regard. | Alex thinks that sexual freedom is good, presumably because he thinks true sexual freedom would somehow eliminate the sexual 'market' or because he thinks that a completely promiscuous mating system (polygynandry) will still result in unselected males having more sex than under the current system, basically that a 'rising tide lifts all boats', in this regard. | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
*The CIA infiltrating and subverting feminism, turning it into what he calls "Nazi-feminism." | *The CIA infiltrating and subverting feminism, turning it into what he calls "Nazi-feminism." | ||
*The promotion of alternatives to heterosexual sex, such as homosexuality, masturbation, and any other kind of sexual activity that does not involve vaginal intercourse between a heterosexual couple composed of two members of their natal sex, as he considers these 'not real sex' and an 'imitation of sex'.<ref>https://www.instagram.com/p/CB_Jvxtqku4/</ref> | *The promotion of alternatives to heterosexual sex, such as homosexuality, masturbation, and any other kind of sexual activity that does not involve vaginal intercourse between a heterosexual couple composed of two members of their natal sex, as he considers these 'not real sex' and an 'imitation of sex'.<ref>https://www.instagram.com/p/CB_Jvxtqku4/</ref> | ||
===Psychiatry=== | ===Psychiatry=== | ||
He thinks labels such as schizophrenia, autism etc., are often abstract labels society reifies and puts on those who don't conform to its expectations instead of existing as objective illnesses. In other words, he, like many leftists, views psychiatric diagnoses as being a result of capitalist alienation/social control. | He thinks labels such as schizophrenia, autism etc., are often abstract labels society reifies and puts on those who don't conform to its expectations instead of existing as objective illnesses. In other words, he, like many leftists, views psychiatric diagnoses as being a result of capitalist alienation/social control. | ||