Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Dogpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Surveys
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
A subsequent study of "highly intelligent women" conducted in 1974 by psychologist Manfred F. DeMartino found that 7 percent of the sample admitted to having engaged in various forms of sexual activity with animals, primarily with dogs.<ref>https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783662385869</ref> The author concluded that due to the figure being higher than in the previous study by Kinsey et al. (1953), more intelligent women may be more prone to engaging in such acts (presumably because openness to new experience correlates with [[IQ]]). | A subsequent study of "highly intelligent women" conducted in 1974 by psychologist Manfred F. DeMartino found that 7 percent of the sample admitted to having engaged in various forms of sexual activity with animals, primarily with dogs.<ref>https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783662385869</ref> The author concluded that due to the figure being higher than in the previous study by Kinsey et al. (1953), more intelligent women may be more prone to engaging in such acts (presumably because openness to new experience correlates with [[IQ]]). | ||
WSU research showed that across 144 cultures, dogs that interacted with women were 220% more likely to be treated like people and | WSU research showed that across 144 cultures, dogs that interacted with women were 220% more likely to be treated like people and women more likely have a dog ''sleeping alongside them'' than men,<ref>https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/not-quite-mans-best-friend-its-women-who-have-a-dog-sleep-alongside-who-think-of-them-as-having-souls/</ref> challenging the notion of dogs being men's 'best friend', but rather women's. | ||
Miletski (2002) reported that 87% of males and 100% of females who reported any sexual contacts with animals reported dogs as their non-human sexual partner. Further, both Beetz (cited in Beetz 2005) and Williams and Weinberg (2003) reported dogs as the primary sexually used animals.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282844608_Bestiality_An_Overview_and_Analytic_Discussion</ref> This may in part be explained by the fact that most other pet's sexual organs are incompatible in dimensions and that dogs spontaneously engage in humping or mounting behavior more often than other pets. | Miletski (2002) reported that 87% of males and 100% of females who reported any sexual contacts with animals reported dogs as their non-human sexual partner. Further, both Beetz (cited in Beetz 2005) and Williams and Weinberg (2003) reported dogs as the primary sexually used animals.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282844608_Bestiality_An_Overview_and_Analytic_Discussion</ref> This may in part be explained by the fact that most other pet's sexual organs are incompatible in dimensions and that dogs spontaneously engage in humping or mounting behavior more often than other pets. | ||