6,353
edits
Alex Undersky: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→'Vaginocapitalism'
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
===='Vaginocapitalism'==== | ===='Vaginocapitalism'==== | ||
Undersky has constructed a Marxian historical materialist type analysis of modern Capitalism. He claims that 'access to the vagina' is now the main driver of the accumulation of capital and exploitation in modern industrialized societies owing to men's strong desire for sex and women's natural tendency to financialise sex.<ref>https://vk.com/@leftantifem-vaginokapitalizm</ref> | Undersky has constructed a novel Marxian historical materialist type analysis of modern Capitalism. He claims that 'access to the vagina' is now the main driver of the accumulation of capital and exploitation in modern industrialized societies owing to men's strong desire for sex and women's natural tendency to financialise sex.<ref>https://vk.com/@leftantifem-vaginokapitalizm</ref> | ||
Whereas Marx saw the remorseless expansion of capital into all spheres and the appropriation of the surplus-value of the worker's labor by the employer as the root of the exploitation and alienation of the masses he saw was inherent in the Capitalist system, with the bourgeois and capital holding classes constituting the main exploiter classes, Undersky refines this critique and claims women are now the primary exploiter class in modern society. Essentially, the divide between men and women is the primary class divide in modern society according to this theory, with even the wealthiest men still essentially being slaves to women's sexuality. | Whereas Marx saw the remorseless expansion of capital into all spheres and the appropriation of the surplus-value of the worker's labor by the employer as the root of the exploitation and alienation of the masses he saw was inherent in the Capitalist system, with the bourgeois and capital holding classes constituting the main exploiter classes, Undersky refines this critique and claims women are now the primary exploiter class in modern society. Essentially, the divide between men and women is the primary class divide in modern society according to this theory, with even the wealthiest men still essentially being slaves to women's sexuality. | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
{{Quote| "The vagina is the private property of women [...] its owner (is) a capitalist, in this case - vaginocapitalist. Access to the vagina is the key to exploitation in the modern world".|Alex}} | {{Quote| "The vagina is the private property of women [...] its owner (is) a capitalist, in this case - vaginocapitalist. Access to the vagina is the key to exploitation in the modern world".|Alex}} | ||
===="Incomplete Sexual Revolution"==== | ===="Incomplete Sexual Revolution"==== | ||
Unlike the [[redpill]] or any of its derivative [[pill jargon|pills]] Alex views the [[sexual revolution]] of the 1960s favourably but believes it only lasted ten years and was then strangled by the capitalists and traditionalists, who instituted an "age of egoism". He believes the sexual revolution is not complete because women gained 100% access to sex, but men have lost that freedom which he claims existed in hippie cultures.<ref>https://archive.md/lN2Uf#selection-231.263-239.89</ref> | Unlike the [[redpill]] or any of its derivative [[pill jargon|pills]] Alex views the [[sexual revolution]] of the 1960s favourably but believes it only lasted ten years and was then strangled by the capitalists and traditionalists, who instituted an "age of egoism". He believes the sexual revolution is not complete because women gained 100% access to sex, but men have lost that freedom which he claims existed in hippie cultures.<ref>https://archive.md/lN2Uf#selection-231.263-239.89</ref> | ||