Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:Roy Baumeister: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Baumeister was commenting on female sex drive, ie who they desire, not just who they submit to in a patriarchal context. He devotes like a tiny paragraph to the idea that female submission could be why they are flexible but ends up spending more time on other reasons.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 20:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC) | Baumeister was commenting on female sex drive, ie who they desire, not just who they submit to in a patriarchal context. He devotes like a tiny paragraph to the idea that female submission could be why they are flexible but ends up spending more time on other reasons.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 20:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
: Likely because it isn't PC. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 20:31, 23 March 2020 (UTC) | : Likely because it isn't PC. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 20:31, 23 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
==Drive vs reception== | |||
Previous edits implied Baumeister was writing about female sexual receptivity/submission when Roy was mainly writing about female sex ''drive''. Previous edts were trying to conflate 'Women submit to society', one of Roy's points, with 'women are forever passive', a common tradcon rally that doesn't make any meaningful horizontal sense.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 19:31, 10 May 2020 (UTC) | |||