Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Good genes hypothesis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Good genes hypothesis''' is the belief that the choosy sex in a species sexually selects those with genes most beneficial to long term survival of the species. [[Blackpiller]]s often promote this view of humans, usually by calling incels [[subhuman]] or genetically inferior because of being rejected by women. And then rejecting arguments to the contrary as [[cope]]. This belief leads some to a belief in promoting suicide for incels, eugenics, or social Darwinism. | The '''Good genes hypothesis''' is the belief that the choosy sex in a species sexually selects those with genes most beneficial to long term survival of the species. [[Blackpiller]]s often promote this view of humans, usually by calling incels [[subhuman]] or genetically inferior because of being rejected by women. And then rejecting arguments to the contrary as [[cope]]. This belief leads some to a belief in promoting suicide for incels, eugenics, or social Darwinism. | ||
==Alternative beliefs== | |||
An alternative belief, for example, would be that humans are undergoing a [[fisherian runaway]], or where sexual selection intensifies to the point of being malapdative. One could also alternatively believe that sexual selection in general is relaxing, leading to a decline in fitness. | |||
== Homocel hypothesis == | == Homocel hypothesis == | ||