Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Good genes hypothesis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Good genes hypothesis''' is the belief that the choosy sex in a species sexually selects those with genes most beneficial to long term survival of the species. [[Blackpiller]]s often promote this view of humans, usually by calling incels [[subhuman]] or genetically inferior because of being rejected by women. And then rejecting arguments to the contrary as [[cope]]. This belief leads some to a belief in promoting suicide for incels, eugenics, or social Darwinism. | The '''Good genes hypothesis''' is the belief that the choosy sex in a species sexually selects those with genes most beneficial to long term survival of the species. [[Blackpiller]]s often promote this view of humans, usually by calling incels [[subhuman]] or genetically inferior because of being rejected by women. And then rejecting arguments to the contrary as [[cope]]. This belief leads some to a belief in promoting suicide for incels, eugenics, or social Darwinism. | ||
== Homocel hypothesis == | |||
The prevalence of outright [[Chad]] worship among some [[blackpill]]ed incels appears to have a homoerotic undertone, reminding of the [[homocel hypothesis]]. Chad worship may ultimately be driven by a desire to get [[homosexuality|sodomized]] by Chad after telling him how great his genes are in order to get some crumbs in return. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||