Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Dogpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Reasoning
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[File:Ohno.jpg|thumb|right|[[Dickmog]]s you.]] | [[File:Ohno.jpg|thumb|right|[[Dickmog]]s you.]] | ||
The strongest evidence for the dogpill comes from internet forums. There are, in fact, more [[#Dogpill_forums|internet forums with women fantasizing about sex with dogs]] than there are forums dedicated to women lusting after male virgins. To our best knowledge, in fact, no forum of the latter kind exists. | The strongest evidence for the dogpill comes from internet forums. There are, in fact, more [[#Dogpill_forums|internet forums with women fantasizing about sex with dogs]] than there are forums dedicated to women lusting after male virgins. To our best knowledge, in fact, no forum of the latter kind exists. This is supported by the fact that women report finding male virgins sexually less attractive than partnered men.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Women_are_more_attracted_to_men_who_are_already_in_relationships_than_single_men</ref> | ||
Many breeds of dogs also have a much larger penis than an average human male,<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0093691X13001052 Bulbus glanis + Pars longa glandis is 17.4±1.19 cm compared to human 13.12±1.66 cm, i.e. about 30% longer across a variety of breeds, with the average being longer than 97.6% of men</ref><ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bju.13010</ref> thus making the dogpill concomitant with the [[dickpill]]. | Many breeds of dogs also have a much larger penis than an average human male,<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0093691X13001052 Bulbus glanis + Pars longa glandis is 17.4±1.19 cm compared to human 13.12±1.66 cm, i.e. about 30% longer across a variety of breeds, with the average being longer than 97.6% of men</ref><ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bju.13010</ref> thus making the dogpill concomitant with the [[dickpill]]. This may explain the large worldwide market for replica dog dildos, with one of the major sites selling these products<ref>https://bad-dragon.com/products/rex</ref> being the 18,622th most popular site in the United States and 33,328th most popular site worldwide in terms of internet traffic.<ref>https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/bad-dragon.com</ref> | ||
Corroborating this, studies have | Corroborating this, studies have documented that women gain sexual gratification from inserting all kinds of objects, sometimes as large as ''soda cans'', into their vaginal orifices,<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3357565/</ref> so it would not be out of the ordinary for women to get horny for other unusual, possibly living objects (just not you). | ||
Data from Google Trends suggest that there was roughly equivalent search volume for the phrase 'dog dildo' as there was for the search term 'realistic dildo'<ref>https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=dog%20dildo,Realistic%20dildo</ref> from 2004 to the present. Disturbingly, one of related queries displayed by Google for the search term 'dog dildo' was the term 'large dog breeds'. This could be seen as some evidence that the women who are purchasing these dildos are also interested in practicing 'the real thing', with an actual ''Canid''. | |||
Alfred Kinsey, the infamous human sexuality researcher, conducted a survey in the 1950s that examined the prevalence of bestiality. It was found that 3.6 percent of adult females sampled confessed to having engaged in such sexual acts after their adolescent period.<ref>Alfred CK, Pomeroy W, Martin C, Gebhard P. 1953. ''Sexual behavior in the human female'' Pt. 2: ''Animal Contacts''. Institute for Sex Research. WB Sanders Company. [[https://doi.org/10.1177%2F000271625429200147 Abstract]]</ref> | Alfred Kinsey, the infamous human sexuality researcher, conducted a survey in the 1950s that examined the prevalence of bestiality. It was found that 3.6 percent of adult females sampled confessed to having engaged in such sexual acts after their adolescent period.<ref>Alfred CK, Pomeroy W, Martin C, Gebhard P. 1953. ''Sexual behavior in the human female'' Pt. 2: ''Animal Contacts''. Institute for Sex Research. WB Sanders Company. [[https://doi.org/10.1177%2F000271625429200147 Abstract]]</ref> | ||
The fifties were likely more socially conservative and thus an even higher figure may be expected in contemporary, post [[sexual revolution]] West. In any case, self-reported surveys attempting to determine the prevalence of zoophilic activities would most likely suffer from a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_desirability_bias severe bias] to under-report respondents level of involvement in such acts. Throughout human history and across cultures, one observes the tendency for women's sexual behavior to be [[female subordination|heavily controlled]] for the purpose of [[paternity assurance]], so they are likely still under social pressures encouraging chastity and obedience in women which may cause such a bias. | The fifties were likely more socially conservative and thus an even higher figure may be expected in contemporary, post [[sexual revolution]] West. In any case, self-reported surveys attempting to determine the prevalence of zoophilic activities would most likely suffer from a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_desirability_bias severe bias] to under-report respondents level of involvement in such acts. Throughout human history and across cultures, one observes the tendency for women's sexual behavior to be [[female subordination|heavily controlled]] for the purpose of [[paternity assurance]], so they are likely still under social pressures encouraging chastity and obedience in women which may cause such a bias. | ||
Also, the figure of 3.6 might sound low, but it is roughly equivalent to the number of adolescent males who have been diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in the United States.<ref>https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2667712</ref> | Also, the figure of 3.6 might sound low, but it is roughly equivalent to the number of adolescent males who have been diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in the United States.<ref>https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2667712</ref> Moreover, people have on average 600 acquaintances,<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/19/science/the-average-american-knows-how-many-people.html</ref> and if the figure above is accurate, then it is almost certain that everyone has encountered at least one female who has had sexual intercourse with a dog. | ||
A subsequent study of "highly intelligent women" conducted in 1974 by | A subsequent study of "highly intelligent women" conducted in 1974 by psychologist Manfred F. DeMartino found that 7 percent of the sample admitted to having engaged in various forms of sexual activity with animals, primarily with dogs.<ref>https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783662385869</ref> The author concluded that, due to the figure being higher than in the previous study by Kinsey et al. (1953), more intelligent women may be more prone to engaging in such acts (presumably because openness to new experience correlates with [[IQ]]). | ||
The figures cited above are likely higher than the amount of women that would be receptive to the idea of dating or having sex with a [[truecel]]. While most studies into the subject have found that men admit to engaging in zoophilic acts more often than women, it can be argued that men frequently perform these deeds out of desperation (because of males much higher [[libido]]). Conversely, due to women's lower libido on average as compared to men and their typical ease of finding a willing sexual partner, it can be argued that women perform these acts more often solely due to zoophilic preferences. | The figures cited above are likely higher than the amount of women that would be receptive to the idea of dating or having sex with a [[truecel]]. While most studies into the subject have found that men admit to engaging in zoophilic acts more often than women, it can be argued that men frequently perform these deeds out of desperation (because of males much higher [[libido]]). Conversely, due to women's lower libido on average as compared to men and their typical ease of finding a willing sexual partner, it can be argued that women perform these acts more often solely due to zoophilic preferences. | ||