Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Talk:Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→New lede: new section
No edit summary |
(→New lede: new section) |
||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
==Would advocate taking a break from this page== | ==Would advocate taking a break from this page== | ||
As it is taking up too much time, although it is much better than how it was before and thank you for improving it[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC) | As it is taking up too much time, although it is much better than how it was before and thank you for improving it[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
== New lede == | |||
Altmark22, Limerencel and me have been discussing the lede. We came up with the following alternative which better captures the current mainstream meaning: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
The blackpill is a philosophy that claims that [[looks]] are the most important factor in female human mate choice, dwarfing over factors such as [[personality]], [[game|confidence]], [[IQ|intelligence]], and even [[LMS|money and status]]. It also borrows observations from the [[redpill] in regards to female nature, i.e claims of rampant female [[hypergamy]] and disloyalty. | |||
It follows from this that one's [[SMV]] is largely fixed, or at least very difficult to increase, leading to rivalry with the redpill philosophy. | |||
Many blackpillers argue that [[tradcon|traditional gender roles]] suppressed women's superficial preferences regarding male looks, and without reinstating these traditional gender roles,[4][5] there is no hope for men that women deem unattractive. | |||
</blockquote> | |||
[[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 15:41, 5 March 2020 (UTC) | |||