Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Talk:Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Lede neutrality
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
:: You are raising good points. Then I think we should make a clear distinction: You are right that there was and still is an extremely cultish blackpill movement on incels.co with an obnoxious hyperfocus on looks ("join us and LDAR" etc.), which I have admittedly never paid close attention to. Reddit also had lots of this (which presumably caused Reddit to shut down these subs), but there was a separate blackpill culture on Reddit in the same subs which was mostly about edgy memeing and scientific curiosity about dating studies (e.g. blackpillscience). It was edgy memeing (like political satire) about how hopeless the dating sphere seemed, rather than actual advice to give up, at least for me and I'm sure for many others (I've seen others describing it as "a place to vent"). So, these are two separate things. | :: You are raising good points. Then I think we should make a clear distinction: You are right that there was and still is an extremely cultish blackpill movement on incels.co with an obnoxious hyperfocus on looks ("join us and LDAR" etc.), which I have admittedly never paid close attention to. Reddit also had lots of this (which presumably caused Reddit to shut down these subs), but there was a separate blackpill culture on Reddit in the same subs which was mostly about edgy memeing and scientific curiosity about dating studies (e.g. blackpillscience). It was edgy memeing (like political satire) about how hopeless the dating sphere seemed, rather than actual advice to give up, at least for me and I'm sure for many others (I've seen others describing it as "a place to vent"). So, these are two separate things. | ||
:: Maybe we should after all move all of the science-y stuff to [[Scientific Blackpill (Summary)]] as discussed before. I'd also be willing to move the more political considerations to a user subpage as it adds aspects to the movement which were novel rather than descriptive. The only reason I started summarizing the Scientific Blackpill on [[Blackpill]] was that it already mentioned some science on looks and dual mating (much of which | :: Maybe we should after all move all of the science-y stuff to [[Scientific Blackpill (Summary)]] as discussed before. I'd also be willing to move the more political considerations to a user subpage as it adds aspects to the movement which were novel rather than descriptive. The only reason I started summarizing the Scientific Blackpill on [[Blackpill]] was that it already mentioned some science on looks and dual mating (much of which was wrong or outdated). [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 14:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
==Reverted back to agreed upon revision== | ==Reverted back to agreed upon revision== | ||
To avoid unecessary conflict, the page is at an agreed upon revision. One that took years to reach consensus about. It's locked temporarily to avoid edit wars.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 14:07, 29 February 2020 (UTC) | To avoid unecessary conflict, the page is at an agreed upon revision. One that took years to reach consensus about. It's locked temporarily to avoid edit wars.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 14:07, 29 February 2020 (UTC) | ||