Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Talk:Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Lede neutrality: new section
Tag: Undo |
(→Lede neutrality: new section) |
||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
==GII== | ==GII== | ||
Is not as good as the OECD gender pay gap in measuring roles rather than outcome). Japan has higher division of labor and women work less hours in Japan for lower pay than most developed countries, including the USA. And it doesn't have to do with any 'gender equality paradox' as Swedish women and women in other 'model gender-equal countries' earn more than in less gender-equal countries such as the US and Japan. https://www.oecd.org/japan/Gender2017-JPN-en.pdf [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 18:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC) | Is not as good as the OECD gender pay gap in measuring roles rather than outcome). Japan has higher division of labor and women work less hours in Japan for lower pay than most developed countries, including the USA. And it doesn't have to do with any 'gender equality paradox' as Swedish women and women in other 'model gender-equal countries' earn more than in less gender-equal countries such as the US and Japan. https://www.oecd.org/japan/Gender2017-JPN-en.pdf [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 18:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
== Lede neutrality == | |||
I removed that "Some add to this definition an entire controversial philosophy" because it was cumbersome since anyone who reads "blackpillers believe X" will get that it is a movement/philosophy. | |||
Currently, the lede is not neutral anymore as it highlights the worst members of the movement. | |||
I vote for restoring the slim lede we had before. Also please stop protecting pages and use talk pages instead. [[User:Limerencel]] should have done so before rewriting the entire lede too. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 04:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC) | |||