Talk:Game: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
237 bytes added ,  2 February 2020
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 42: Line 42:
: Wait a minute, "By far, the largest determinant of the subjects liking of their dates was their dates physical attractiveness. r = .69 for women rating men." Thought u would come here showing .8+ All that study does is reinforce the  game is just icing on the cake statement that is already in the lead. "Indeed all face to face game is a combination of physical attractiveness, vocal attractiveness, gait attractiveness, social status attractiveness, and smell attractiveness. Attractive dancing, attractive singing, attractive hobbies, attractive fashion, attractive posing, attractive posturing, as well as attractive facial, attractive vocal, and attractive body expressions, are all icing on the cake so to speak." [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 22:30, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
: Wait a minute, "By far, the largest determinant of the subjects liking of their dates was their dates physical attractiveness. r = .69 for women rating men." Thought u would come here showing .8+ All that study does is reinforce the  game is just icing on the cake statement that is already in the lead. "Indeed all face to face game is a combination of physical attractiveness, vocal attractiveness, gait attractiveness, social status attractiveness, and smell attractiveness. Attractive dancing, attractive singing, attractive hobbies, attractive fashion, attractive posing, attractive posturing, as well as attractive facial, attractive vocal, and attractive body expressions, are all icing on the cake so to speak." [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 22:30, 2 February 2020 (UTC)


:: r > .8 is very rare due to measurement errors and confounds, hence people already call r > .5 a strong correlation. See you have no damn clue about social science, yet you pretend to do so. They have found no significant results for other traits which means the effects of other traits are probably small or non-existent. At least in 1:1 dating. Game-like peacocking is likely an effective means of status ascension which in turn enables RS. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 23:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
:: r > .8 is very rare due to measurement errors and confounds, hence people already call r > .6 a strong correlation. See you have no damn clue about social science, yet you pretend to do so. They have found no significant results for other traits which means the effects of other traits are probably small or non-existent. At least in 1:1 dating. Game-like peacocking is likely an effective means of status ascension which in turn enables RS. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 23:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
::: Stop talking shit and then agreeing with me. Stop talking shit, and then apologizing. .5 is a medium correlation, stop lieing. Now stop messaging me. [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 23:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
::: Stop talking shit and then agreeing with me. Stop talking shit, and then apologizing. .5 is a medium correlation, stop lieing. Now stop messaging me. [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 23:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
:::: I meant to write r > .6 (typo). I didn't agree with you. I made an distinction between 1:1 and socializing which you didn't make. Well, you deleted it. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 23:32, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
17,538

edits

Navigation menu