Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Talk:Gait: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Complete nonsense
(→Complete nonsense: Read the fucking studies referenced) |
|||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
: Read the fucking references, you stupid idiot thats what they are there for. [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 14:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC) | : Read the fucking references, you stupid idiot thats what they are there for. [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 14:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: This still has nothing to do with gait, lol. That's like making a subsection on "money" on the beauty article because women are attracted to money. Completely irrelevant. Gait is not the same as nonverbal behavior. The term "nonverbal movement" makes no sense. The linked study has a ridiculous sample size and 2D:4D ratio suffered replication crisis: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178917300174 [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 16:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
:: The study you've linked about dancing was also seriously flawed: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234139342_The_Anatomy_of_a_Fraud_Symmetry_and_Dance Though the correlation of HGS and dacing probabily exist, but it's probably just evidence of overall body strength. Perception of dance quality may be a halo effect from body strength which determine most of male bodily attractiveness. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 16:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
:: Changes in preferences for masculinity across the ovulation cycle have also had a replication crisis: | |||
::: <blockquote>several recent studies have found no change in mate preferences among women at the peri-ovulatory phase for muscularity48,49, facial masculinity23,49,50, beards23,51, vocal masculinity52,53 and facial symmetry49. Thus, the extent to which ovulatory cycle shifts are associated with women’s mate preferences may have been overestimated in past research due to imprecise methodologies and small sample sizes54.</blockquote> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-39350-8 [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 16:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
:: I told you several times before not to write about things that you have no clue about. You have added so many falsities and inaccuracies to this wiki that I'm getting really tired of cleaning them up. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 16:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC) | |||