Talk:Demand side sexual economics: Difference between revisions

Talk:Demand side sexual economics (edit)

19 bytes removed , 6 January 2020

no edit summary

25,837

edits

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 If one does not regard women as vendors, then supply and demand seem the same in the sexual market because both can sell sex then (different from real economics in which the buyers are mostly the mass consumers and the sellers some companies producing products and services). So I think one needs to make this distinction women=vendors. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 01:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
-Supply-siders focus on price, penalties etc of supply.  Demand-siders don't  So if increasing purchasing power is done through a "supply-side" method, it's not demand-side.  E.g. "tax reduction" (or increase) is not seen as "demand-side" economics, as it is a regulation on the price of supply.  It doesn't mean demand-siders are entirely opposed to such things, they just don't focus much on it[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 01:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
+:I agree with your first two paragraphs there.  Also, Enforced monogamy is something like sex socialism, but only for certain people.  It doesn't really fit any economic model.  I labeled it supply side because it reduces the supply of women.  But it also regulates demand.
+  But given it overall reduces market forces overall, I should probably delink supply-side economics from the blackpill article([[User talk:William|talk]]) 01:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)