Talk:Demand side sexual economics: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
If one does not regard women as vendors, then supply and demand seem the same in the sexual market because both can sell sex then (different from real economics in which the buyers are mostly the mass consumers and the sellers some companies producing products and services). So I think one needs to make this distinction women=vendors. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 01:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
If one does not regard women as vendors, then supply and demand seem the same in the sexual market because both can sell sex then (different from real economics in which the buyers are mostly the mass consumers and the sellers some companies producing products and services). So I think one needs to make this distinction women=vendors. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 01:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


:In economics, focusing on "supply" means focusing on prices of the "supply".  So if increasing purchasing power is done through a "supply-side" method, it's not demand-side.  E.g. "tax reduction" (or increase) is not seen as "demand-side" economics.  It doesn't mean demand-siders are entirely opposed to such things, they just don't focus much on it[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 01:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Supply-siders focus on price, penalties etc of supply. Demand-siders don't So if increasing purchasing power is done through a "supply-side" method, it's not demand-side.  E.g. "tax reduction" (or increase) is not seen as "demand-side" economics, as it is a regulation on the price of supply.  It doesn't mean demand-siders are entirely opposed to such things, they just don't focus much on it[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 01:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
25,837

edits

Navigation menu