2,359
edits
Talk:Mewing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
:::: Impressive is entirely subjective. The author may find a 0.25 or even a 0.50 point increase on the decile without surgery as impressive. Also none of the acedemics use the term mewing, instead they use the term tongue posture. Also on an unrelated note found an obscure study on a more attractive facial profile being correlated with getting hired for a job. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484273/ | :::: Impressive is entirely subjective. The author may find a 0.25 or even a 0.50 point increase on the decile without surgery as impressive. Also none of the acedemics use the term mewing, instead they use the term tongue posture. Also on an unrelated note found an obscure study on a more attractive facial profile being correlated with getting hired for a job. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484273/ | ||
== Weird findings == | |||
There's way more anecdotal evidence for mewing greatly improving voice/singing quality, than facial attractiveness. [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 03:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | |||