Betabux: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
244 bytes added ,  28 December 2019
Line 18: Line 18:
== Evidence ==
== Evidence ==


Betabuxxing is not a highly prevalent phenomena, but it likely does exist, possibly more often in very progressive circles. E.g. non-paternity rates are very low in the U.S. (just about 3%). There is some evidence on the [[demographics of inceldom#virgintable|demographics of inceldom#virgintable]] article in that there is a sudden drop of male adult virgins around 35 which is is not present in women. It suddenly drops from 3.1% to 1.3%, suggesting around 1% of males are a storybook betabux. However, one can also describe all betas in society providing for the high incident rates of [[single mother]]s as instance of the betabux phenomenon, with the state acting like a provider male.
Betabuxxing is not a highly prevalent phenomenon, but it likely does exist, possibly more often in very progressive circles. Non-paternity rates are very low in the U.S. (just about 3%). Some 10% of families in the U.S. are lead by single mothers, so evidently few men like to care for them (being reluctant to care for other men's children).<ref>https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_single_parent_family_income_distribution.svg</ref> There is some evidence on the [[demographics of inceldom#virgintable|demographics of inceldom]] article in that there is a sudden drop of male adult virgins around 35 which is is not present in women. It suddenly drops from 3.1% to 1.3%, suggesting around 1% of males are a storybook betabux betas. However, one can also describe all betas in society providing for the high incident rates of [[single mother]]s as instance of the betabux phenomenon, with the state acting like a provider male.


== The archaetypal beta provider ==
== The archaetypal beta provider ==
17,538

edits

Navigation menu