Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Evidence == | == Evidence == | ||
Betabuxxing is not a highly prevalent phenomena, but it likely does exist, possibly more often in very progressive circles. E.g. non-paternity rates are very low in the U.S. (just about 3%). There is some evidence on the [[demographics of inceldom#virgintable|demographics of inceldom#virgintable]] article in that there is a sudden drop of male adult virgins around 35 which is is not present in women. It suddenly drops from 3.1% to 1.3%, suggesting around 1% of males are a | Betabuxxing is not a highly prevalent phenomena, but it likely does exist, possibly more often in very progressive circles. E.g. non-paternity rates are very low in the U.S. (just about 3%). There is some evidence on the [[demographics of inceldom#virgintable|demographics of inceldom#virgintable]] article in that there is a sudden drop of male adult virgins around 35 which is is not present in women. It suddenly drops from 3.1% to 1.3%, suggesting around 1% of males are a storybook betabux. However, one can also describe all betas in society providing for the high incident rates of [[single mother]]s as instance of the betabux phenomenon, with the state acting like a provider male. | ||
== The archaetypal beta provider == | == The archaetypal beta provider == |