Women in STEM: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
836 bytes removed ,  25 December 2019
Line 25: Line 25:
<br>
<br>


== Women in STEM is likely statistically beneficial to dating, but only by a small amount ==
== Women in STEM is only a tiny bit beneficial in dating==
While it may be corrupting to the [[STEM]] fields, having co-ed classes seems to be statistically more beneficial to incels than not, when controlling for time.  Indeed, cording to a study by Ivy [[penis|Wong]], students in single-sex classes report later onset of dating experience and fewer dating partners than members of co-ed classes,<ref>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1187-6</ref> however the effect sizes were small (d = .2) and in most other measures of sexual activity there were no significant effects.  So in other words, yes having co-ed classes means more dates and partners, just by a very small amount.
While it may be corrupting to the [[STEM]] fields, having co-ed classes seems to be statistically more beneficial to incels than not, when controlling for time.  Indeed, cording to a study by Ivy [[penis|Wong]], students in single-sex classes report later onset of dating experience and fewer dating partners than members of co-ed classes,<ref>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1187-6</ref> however the effect sizes were small (d = .2) and in most other measures of sexual activity there were no significant effects.  So in other words, yes having co-ed classes means more dates and partners, just by a very small amount.


According to the [[Donnelly Study]], some incels report gender segregation at work and lack of exposure to females in general as a cause of their celibacy, especially among male incels.<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref>  A study of Redditors found lack of exposure to the opposite gender as the ~9th most common cause of their singledom and 4.70% of all responses (see [[causes of inceldom]]).
According to the [[Donnelly Study]], some incels report gender segregation at work and lack of exposure to females in general as a cause of their celibacy, especially among male incels.<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref>  A study of Redditors found lack of exposure to the opposite gender as the ~9th most common cause of their singledom and 4.70% of all responses (see [[causes of inceldom]]).


On the other hand, most STEM jobs are fairly high-status positions and hence such women are expected to become more choosy about other men's incomes (see [[hypergamy]]), especially due to the highly competitive nature of the field. In addition, with [[metoo]] and other anti-harrassment measures, the workplace is becoming unpopular for dating, e.g. "meeting through coworkers" has declined 50% since 1990 despite decreasing gender segregation.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Meeting_online_is_now_the_primary_way_relationships_are_formed</ref>
Also, even though sex-segregation has decreased, incel rates are also at all-time high (see [[demographics]]), suggesting that simply having co-ed classes/workplaces probably isn't anywhere enough to reduce inceldom. This is mostly explainable by less men going to college and women being more picky, as there is no study that shows being closer to the opposite gender hinders your ability with women.
Today, as many as 28% of men avoid one-on-one meetings with female work collegues.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#27.25_of_men_report_avoiding_one-on-one_meetings_with_female_work_colleagues</ref>
Many workplaces actively discourage romances.
Also, even though sex-segregation has decreased, incel rates are also at all-time high (see [[demographics]]), suggesting that simply having co-ed classes/workplaces isn't enough to reduce inceldom. This is mostly explainable by less men going to college and women being more picky, as there is no study that shows being closer to the opposite gender hinders your ability with women.


==Women as "pioneers in STEM"==
==Women as "pioneers in STEM"==
25,837

edits

Navigation menu