Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Women in STEM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Women in STEM Is statistically beneficial to men, but only by a small amount
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
== Women in STEM | == Women in STEM is likely statistically beneficial to dating, but only by a small amount == | ||
While it may be corrupting to the [[STEM]] fields, having co-ed classes seems to be statistically more beneficial to incels than not, when controlling for time. Indeed, cording to a study by Ivy [[penis|Wong]], students in single-sex classes report later onset of dating experience and fewer dating partners than members of co-ed classes,<ref>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1187-6</ref> however the effect sizes were small (d = .2) and in most other measures of sexual activity there were no significant effects. So in other words, yes having co-ed classes means more dates and partners, just by a very small amount. | While it may be corrupting to the [[STEM]] fields, having co-ed classes seems to be statistically more beneficial to incels than not, when controlling for time. Indeed, cording to a study by Ivy [[penis|Wong]], students in single-sex classes report later onset of dating experience and fewer dating partners than members of co-ed classes,<ref>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1187-6</ref> however the effect sizes were small (d = .2) and in most other measures of sexual activity there were no significant effects. So in other words, yes having co-ed classes means more dates and partners, just by a very small amount. | ||