Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:Women in STEM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→women in STEM
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
It's like the antidepressant argument. I can say that antidepressants '''don't work'' because suicide rates are going up. Well, that actually doesn't prove that antidepressants don't work. It's just an argument that they are not strong antidepressants and they shouldn't be used as first line treatment. To prove they don't work you need to reference a good study that isn't just correlation, which then show that yes, antidepressants don't actually work. | It's like the antidepressant argument. I can say that antidepressants '''don't work'' because suicide rates are going up. Well, that actually doesn't prove that antidepressants don't work. It's just an argument that they are not strong antidepressants and they shouldn't be used as first line treatment. To prove they don't work you need to reference a good study that isn't just correlation, which then show that yes, antidepressants don't actually work. | ||
tl;dr, framing it as "do co-ed classes improve the incels situation" is | tl;dr, framing it as "do co-ed classes improve the incels situation", and then stuffing the paragraph with correlates is odd when co-ed classes clearly help incels. Framing it as "how much do they help" is more accurate.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 21:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC) | ||