Women in STEM: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
416 bytes removed ,  21 December 2019
Line 23: Line 23:
<br>
<br>
A female entry into low-paying STEM spaces, while it may be corrupting to the STEM field, may be a boon to incels' sex lives.  According to the [[Donnelly Study]],<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref> male-only work spaces were one of the largest predictors of inceldom.
A female entry into low-paying STEM spaces, while it may be corrupting to the STEM field, may be a boon to incels' sex lives.  According to the [[Donnelly Study]],<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref> male-only work spaces were one of the largest predictors of inceldom.
<!--(Yes please cite whatever Peterson is citing, as verbal anecdotes from an anti-incel are not valued to most incels.) On the other hand, [[Jordan Peterson]] mentioned an anecdote of a university course (what kind of university course?) which was overwhelmingly visited by female students, but only few of the most dominant males got to hook up with them despite the vast surplus of females.{{citation needed}}-->


==Women as "pioneers in STEM"==
==Women as "pioneers in STEM"==
17,538

edits

Navigation menu