Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Women in STEM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Social Engineering
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
A female entry into low-paying STEM spaces, while it may be corrupting to the STEM field, may be a boon to incels' sex lives. According to the [[Donnelly Study]],<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref> male-only work spaces were one of the largest predictors of inceldom. | A female entry into low-paying STEM spaces, while it may be corrupting to the STEM field, may be a boon to incels' sex lives. According to the [[Donnelly Study]],<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref> male-only work spaces were one of the largest predictors of inceldom. | ||
<!--Yes please cite | <!--(Yes please cite whatever Peterson is citing, as verbal anecdotes from an anti-incel are not valued to most incels.) On the other hand, [[Jordan Peterson]] mentioned an anecdote of a university course (what kind of university course?) which was overwhelmingly visited by female students, but only few of the most dominant males got to hook up with them despite the vast surplus of females.{{citation needed}}--> | ||
==Women as good in STEM== | |||
Feminists hold up various female programmers such as Margaret Hamilton, as examples of women being pioneers in STEM. They usually don't elaborate on how this applies to any large portion of women, nor do they acknowledge that programming is contested as an actual scientific or creative discipline. Computer programmers are frequently derided as workhorses for actual scientists or creative types. | |||
== References == | == References == | ||