Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Women in STEM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Social Engineering
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
A female entry into low-paying STEM spaces, while it may be corrupting to the STEM field, may be a boon to incels' sex lives. According to the [[Donnelly Study]],<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref> male-only work spaces were one of the largest predictors of inceldom. | A female entry into low-paying STEM spaces, while it may be corrupting to the STEM field, may be a boon to incels' sex lives. According to the [[Donnelly Study]],<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref> male-only work spaces were one of the largest predictors of inceldom. | ||
<!-- | <!--Yes please cite the study, as anecdotes from an anti-incel are not valued to most incels. On the other hand, [[Jordan Peterson]] mentioned an anecdote of a university course (what kind of university course?) which was overwhelmingly visited by female students, but only few of the most dominant males got to hook up with them despite the vast surplus of females.{{citation needed}}--> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||