Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
202 bytes added ,  13 December 2019
Line 95: Line 95:
'''Female hypergamy explained by evolutionary psychology'''
'''Female hypergamy explained by evolutionary psychology'''


In terms of evolutionary psychology, hypergamy and women's choosiness can be explained by sex differences in parental investment ([[Bateman's principle]]), which in turn results in sex differences in sex drive.
In terms of evolutionary psychology, hypergamy and women's choosiness can be explained by sex differences in parental investment ([[Bateman's principle]]). This creates sex differences in sex drive with men being much more promiscuous maters and women evolving to be coy and dependent on men.
Being physically weaker, women are believed to choose the most dominant male available to be protected from contenders (bodyguard hypothesis<ref>https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4615-5985-6_21</ref>) and to get access to high quality foods.<ref>http://web.simmons.edu/%7Eturnerg/MCC/Matechoice2PDF.pdf</ref> Especially when many women accumulate at the most dominant males (polygyny), it implies women tend to date up overall and there is a surplus of men at the bottom of the socioeconomic hierarchy without any sex.
 
<!--Women want resources from men because women have been heavily dependent on men's resources throughout history.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill_(Supplemental)#Women_were_historically_predominantly_involved_in_cooking_and_they_never_dominated_men</ref>
Men want sex and paternal certainty (a problem that women do not face).<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12496732</ref>
 
In the sex market men can sell the resources and women can sell exclusive access to sex.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016748701630277X</ref><ref>https://d-nb.info/997448148/34</ref>
 
This results in women having much more options to choose from and in chronic sexual frustration for most men.<ref>Baumeister, R.F. and Tice, D.M., 2001. The social dimension of sex. Allyn & Bacon.</ref>
This results in women having much more options to choose from and in chronic sexual frustration for most men.<ref>Baumeister, R.F. and Tice, D.M., 2001. The social dimension of sex. Allyn & Bacon.</ref>
Men and women aim up to the same extent and few aim unrealistically high,<ref>https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/4/8/eaap9815.full.pdf</ref>
Men and women aim up to the same extent and few aim unrealistically high,<ref>https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/4/8/eaap9815.full.pdf</ref>
but since men have fewer alternative mating options available to them, they more readily make compromises and eventually date down,<ref>https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf</ref>
but since men have fewer alternative mating options available to them, they more readily make compromises and eventually date down,<ref>https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf</ref>
particularly if they experience frequent rejection.<ref>https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/abs/10.1027/1864-9335/a000392</ref>
particularly if they experience frequent rejection.<ref>https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/abs/10.1027/1864-9335/a000392</ref>
For this reason, the population of male incels [[Demographics|tends to be larger]] than female incels, and femcels are likely more often [[volcel|volcels]].


'''Female hypergamy explained by sexual economics'''
In terms of economics, one can also regard sexual relationships as a deal and study them with market principles.
Women want resources from men because women have been heavily dependent on men's resources throughout history.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill_(Supplemental)#Women_were_historically_predominantly_involved_in_cooking_and_they_never_dominated_men</ref>
Men want sex and also certainty that the offspring in which they invest their resources is theirs (a problem that women do not face).<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12496732</ref>
One can thus model the sexual market as one in which men can sell the resources and women can sell exclusive access to sex.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016748701630277X</ref><ref>https://d-nb.info/997448148/34</ref>
This means, welfare and affirmative action for women, as well as decreasing economic growth and increasing economic inequality, tend to reduce the [[sexual market value]] of lots of men because provision of resources are men's main goods.
This means, welfare and affirmative action for women, as well as decreasing economic growth and increasing economic inequality, tend to reduce the [[sexual market value]] of lots of men because provision of resources are men's main goods.
Women's sexual market value is, on the other hand, rather determined by their looks and their reputation of non-sluttiness (things that men desire).<ref>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.011</ref>
Women's sexual market value is, on the other hand, rather determined by their looks and their reputation of faithfulness (things that men desire).<ref>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.011</ref>
The economic dynamics in such kind of sexual market are believed to also give rise hypergamy by the [[Hypergamy#Principle_of_least_interest|principle of least interest]],<ref>https://d-nb.info/997448148/34</ref>
The economic dynamics in such kind of sexual market are believed to also give rise hypergamy by the [[Hypergamy#Principle_of_least_interest|principle of least interest]],<ref>https://d-nb.info/997448148/34</ref>
and they also motivate different kinds of intrasexual competition for each sex and are thought to have fundamentally shaped psychological sex differences.<ref>http://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych113</ref>
and they also motivate different kinds of intrasexual competition for each sex and are thought to have fundamentally shaped psychological sex differences.<ref>http://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych113</ref>
 
-->
'''Female hypergamy has intensified'''
'''Female hypergamy has intensified'''


Line 123: Line 123:
'''Female hypergamy — a summary'''
'''Female hypergamy — a summary'''


In summary, women's love style is more opportunistic and transactional than men's. Women are loved nearly unconditionally, men are not. Social expectations for men are overall higher, hence [[Femcel|femcels]] are [[demographics|rarer]] than male incels and more likely [[Volcel|volcels]]. Since women have more dating options available to them, they tend to have much more power over relationships than they like to admit ([[Briffault's law]]).
In summary, women's love style is more opportunistic and transactional than men's. Women are loved nearly unconditionally, men are not. Social expectations for men are overall higher, hence [[Femcel|femcels]] are [[demographics|rarer]] than male incels and more likely [[Volcel|volcels]].
Since women have more dating options available to them, they tend to have much more power over relationships than they like to admit ([[Briffault's law]]).
There exists a strong ''[[women-are-wonderful effect|women-are-wonderful]]'' bias in that women are perceived more favorably than men in all kinds of regards which additionally suggests men are overall held to higher standards.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00792.x</ref>
There exists a strong ''[[women-are-wonderful effect|women-are-wonderful]]'' bias in that women are perceived more favorably than men in all kinds of regards which additionally suggests men are overall held to higher standards.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00792.x</ref>


17,538

edits

Navigation menu