Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Demographics of inceldom: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Sexlessness worse for men?
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
In addition to the greater prevalence of male inceldom, men may face more negative consequences, e.g. because they have a higher [[libido|sex drive]]. Also, in one study, male students had sex gained social status, whereas female students lost peer popularity the more sex they had.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Males_gained_peer_status_through_having_had_sex_and_females_lost_peer_status</ref> | In addition to the greater prevalence of male inceldom, men may face more negative consequences, e.g. because they have a higher [[libido|sex drive]]. Also, in one study, male students had sex gained social status, whereas female students lost peer popularity the more sex they had.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Males_gained_peer_status_through_having_had_sex_and_females_lost_peer_status</ref> | ||
Also, women find men who have sex more attractive.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Women_are_more_attracted_to_men_who_are_already_in_relationships_than_single_men</ref> | Also, women find men who have sex more attractive.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Women_are_more_attracted_to_men_who_are_already_in_relationships_than_single_men</ref> | ||
In a 1989 peer-reviewed study that took place at Florida State University, 75% of men accepted random-sex invitations from random real-life women, men are much more likely to agree to invitations to sex with a random stranger (~5% vs ~65%). This combats the notion that men choose to be celibate when celibacy rates are high, due to 0% of women accepting random-sex no-strings offers in a setting high in casual sex<ref>https://www.sciencefriday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gender-differences-in-receptivity-to-sexual-offers.pdf</ref>. | |||
Some findings suggest single men are more prone to depressive symptoms, but other findings suggest that poor mating performance is related with equally lower well-being for both sexes (see [[adverse effects of inceldom]]). Yet, the difference in libido and coyness should imply that women, but not men, can get sex easily if they wanted. Women exhibit also more [[fake depression|childish neuroticism]] overall which should maybe not be taken as seriously as men's suffering and isolation. | |||
Some [[feminist|feminists]] have claimed the comparison in acceptance to invitations to sex is not a fair measure of how much women suffer from sexlessness because women need to know the men first to be safe. However, there is evidence that women do engage in very adventurous sex with no hope for reciprocity or investment on part of the man, namely if the man has exceptionally [[statusmaxxing|high status]]<ref>https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029939</ref> and/or is exceptionally good looking ([[sexy sons hypothesis]]) and even abusive/violent men ([[hybristophilia]]). Van Halen had ''sex tents'' set up at his performances.<ref>https://www.cracked.com/article_22900_van-halens-sex-hut-8-acts-legendary-rockstar-debauchery.html</ref> This proves women do engage sometimes in adventurous, unsafe sex, therefore most [[femcel|femlcels]] are believed to be [[volcel|volcels]]. Feminists have a point in that women have more [[Bateman's principle|parental investment]], but phenomena like sex tents and sexy sons suggest women exploit their ability to choose from many men somewhat, so their inceldom seems more [[fake depression|self-inflicted]]. Women are naturally [[female solipsism|oblivious]] to these facts. | Some [[feminist|feminists]] have claimed the comparison in acceptance to invitations to sex is not a fair measure of how much women suffer from sexlessness because women need to know the men first to be safe. However, there is evidence that women do engage in very adventurous sex with no hope for reciprocity or investment on part of the man, namely if the man has exceptionally [[statusmaxxing|high status]]<ref>https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00029939</ref> and/or is exceptionally good looking ([[sexy sons hypothesis]]) and even abusive/violent men ([[hybristophilia]]). Van Halen had ''sex tents'' set up at his performances.<ref>https://www.cracked.com/article_22900_van-halens-sex-hut-8-acts-legendary-rockstar-debauchery.html</ref> This proves women do engage sometimes in adventurous, unsafe sex, therefore most [[femcel|femlcels]] are believed to be [[volcel|volcels]]. Feminists have a point in that women have more [[Bateman's principle|parental investment]], but phenomena like sex tents and sexy sons suggest women exploit their ability to choose from many men somewhat, so their inceldom seems more [[fake depression|self-inflicted]]. Women are naturally [[female solipsism|oblivious]] to these facts. | ||