Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:Virgin vs. Chad: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
: "Associating literally anything bad with virgins is virgin shaming" Not necessarily. It could also redpill on the fact that status matters. Or it may simply be used for the crude/offensive humor. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 02:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | : "Associating literally anything bad with virgins is virgin shaming" Not necessarily. It could also redpill on the fact that status matters. Or it may simply be used for the crude/offensive humor. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 02:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
::The memes are about associating anything negative with being incel. Everyone already knows that being incel is not fun. It's just additional emotional negativity association pinned to incels, in an extreme way. Adding humor to something doesn't strip it of it's implications. Regardless this debate has gone on too long. If you disagree with my commentary strongly you can add your disagreement section without trying to censor an admin's commentary.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 02:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | ::The memes are about associating anything negative with being incel. Everyone already knows that being incel is not fun. It's just additional emotional negativity association pinned to incels, in an extreme way. Adding humor to something doesn't strip it of it's implications. Regardless this debate has gone on too long. If you disagree with my commentary strongly you can add your disagreement section without trying to censor an admin's commentary through one-two images on a talk page.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 02:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | ||