Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Homosexuality: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Receptive gay sex is low status
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Receptive gay sex is low status == | == Receptive gay sex is low status == | ||
Access to sex with women is negotiated by dominance status among men.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref><ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513817304105</ref><ref>Kruger DJ, Fitzgerald CJ. 2011. ''Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men.'' Personality and Individual Differences. 50(3):365-9. [[https://www.academia.edu/14471033/Reproductive_strategies_and_relationship_preferences_associated_with_prestigious_and_dominant_men Abstract]]</ref> | Access to sex with women is negotiated by dominance status among men.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref><ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513817304105</ref><ref>Kruger DJ, Fitzgerald CJ. 2011. ''Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men.'' Personality and Individual Differences. 50(3):365-9. [[https://www.academia.edu/14471033/Reproductive_strategies_and_relationship_preferences_associated_with_prestigious_and_dominant_men Abstract]]</ref><ref>Boone, J. L. (1986). Parental investment and elite family structure in preindustrialstates: A case study of late medieval-early modern Portuguese genealogies. Amer-ican Anthropologist, 88, 859-878.</ref><ref>Boone, J. L. (1988). Parental investment, social subordination, and population processes among the 15th and 16th century Portuguese nobility. In L. Betzig, M. B.Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 201-219). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.</ref><ref>Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hy-potheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.</ref><ref>Buss, D. M. (1992). Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice andintrasexual competition. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), Theadapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 249-266).New York: Oxford University Press.</ref><ref>Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York:Basic Books.</ref><ref>Ellis, B. J. (1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms inwomen. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind:Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267-288). New York:Oxford University Press.</ref><ref>Hill, E. M., Nocks, E. S., & Gardner, L. (1987). Physical attractiveness: Manipula-tion by physique and status displays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 143-154.</ref><ref>Mealey, L. (1985). The relationship between social status and biological success: Acase study of the Mormon religious hierarchy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6,249-257.</ref><ref>Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.</ref> | ||
Men who are too weak or incapable of competing for women are rendered incels. | Men who are too weak or incapable of competing for women are rendered incels. | ||
All men are chronically horny because [[libido|men's sex drive is higher than women's]], so the easiest way for male incels to get consenting sex is to offer their [[Buttocks|boypussy]] to other horny men (cf. [[homocel hypothesis]]). | All men are chronically horny because [[libido|men's sex drive is higher than women's]], so the easiest way for male incels to get consenting sex is to offer their [[Buttocks|boypussy]] to other horny men (cf. [[homocel hypothesis]]). Such peripheralized incels can also establish social ties with horny men of higher social standing this way, re-gaining their access to resources and potentially restoring some amount of [[reproductive success]]. | ||
<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref> | |||
Therefore, gayness is associated with low status, and men can use accusations of gayness as means of intrasexual competition and reputation denigration to get ahead in the dominance game of impressing women. Omega males are of no use for betas, so betas exclude and bully them to foil any competitive threat that may arise. Receiving gay sex (the "bottom" rather than the "top") is also widely regarded as submissive and feminine, i.e. weak.<ref>Schippers M. 2007. ''Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony.'' Theory and Society. Vol. 36.1, pp. 85–102. [[http://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4 Abstract]]</ref><ref name="NYC">Wegesin DJ, Meyer-Bahlburg HFL. 2000. ''Top/Bottom Self-Label, Anal Sex Practices, HIV Risk and Gender Role Identity in Gay Men in New York City.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_03 Abstract]] Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality. Vol 12.3, pp. 43–62.</ref><ref>Hoppe T. 2011. ''Circuits of power, circuits of pleasure: Sexual scripting in gay men's bottom narratives'' Sexualities. Vol. 14.2, pp. 193–217. [[http://doi.org/10.1177/1363460711399033 Abstract]]</ref> | Therefore, gayness is associated with low status, and men can use accusations of gayness as means of intrasexual competition and reputation denigration to get ahead in the dominance game of impressing women. Omega males are of no use for betas, so betas exclude and bully them to foil any competitive threat that may arise. Receiving gay sex (being the "bottom" rather than the "top") is also widely regarded as submissive and feminine, i.e. weak.<ref>Schippers M. 2007. ''Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony.'' Theory and Society. Vol. 36.1, pp. 85–102. [[http://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4 Abstract]]</ref><ref name="NYC">Wegesin DJ, Meyer-Bahlburg HFL. 2000. ''Top/Bottom Self-Label, Anal Sex Practices, HIV Risk and Gender Role Identity in Gay Men in New York City.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_03 Abstract]] Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality. Vol 12.3, pp. 43–62.</ref><ref>Hoppe T. 2011. ''Circuits of power, circuits of pleasure: Sexual scripting in gay men's bottom narratives'' Sexualities. Vol. 14.2, pp. 193–217. [[http://doi.org/10.1177/1363460711399033 Abstract]]</ref> | ||
This explains why accusation of being a receptive homosexual was historically just about the worst insult one could level at a man. | This explains why accusation of being a receptive homosexual was historically just about the worst insult one could level at a man. | ||