Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
</li><li> | </li><li> | ||
Extending the idea of introducing laws and rules to regulate behavior like in ''state-issued girlfriends'', one can consider various ways of punishing singlehood and promiscuity, and reinforcing pairing up monogamously, whether by removing existing conditions (negative) or introducing new ones (positive). | Extending the idea of introducing laws and rules to regulate behavior like in ''state-issued girlfriends'', one can consider various ways of punishing singlehood and promiscuity, and reinforcing pairing up monogamously, whether by removing existing conditions (negative) or introducing new ones (positive). | ||
Blackpillers have proposed state subvention could pay male and female incels for pairing up (''positive reinforcement''). Similarly, one could disincentivize promiscuity and singlehood instead, e.g. by taxing promiscuous behavior<ref>https://www.academia.edu/40699045/Flower_Power_Tax_Academic_Supports_FULL_</ref> and singles (''positive punishment''). Further, one could remove burdens that are associated with pairing up, e.g. abolishing harassment laws and | Blackpillers have proposed state subvention could pay male and female incels for pairing up (''positive reinforcement''). Similarly, one could disincentivize promiscuity and singlehood instead, e.g. by taxing promiscuous behavior<ref>https://www.academia.edu/40699045/Flower_Power_Tax_Academic_Supports_FULL_</ref> and singles (''positive punishment''). Further, one could remove burdens that are associated with pairing up, e.g. abolishing harassment laws and no-fault divorce laws (''negative reinforcement''). | ||
Lastly, one could e.g. deprive female singles of certain benefits they may have (''negative punishment''). Of course there may be ethical concerns. | Lastly, one could e.g. deprive female singles of certain benefits they may have (''negative punishment''). Of course there may be ethical concerns. | ||
</li><li> | </li><li> |