Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
9 bytes removed ,  29 October 2019
Line 239: Line 239:
</li><li>
</li><li>
Extending the idea of introducing laws and rules to regulate behavior like in ''state-issued girlfriends'', one can consider various ways of punishing singlehood and promiscuity, and reinforcing pairing up monogamously, whether by removing existing conditions (negative) or introducing new ones (positive).  
Extending the idea of introducing laws and rules to regulate behavior like in ''state-issued girlfriends'', one can consider various ways of punishing singlehood and promiscuity, and reinforcing pairing up monogamously, whether by removing existing conditions (negative) or introducing new ones (positive).  
Blackpillers have proposed state subvention could pay male and female incels for pairing up (''positive reinforcement''). Similarly, one could disincentivize promiscuity and singlehood instead, e.g. by taxing promiscuous behavior<ref>https://www.academia.edu/40699045/Flower_Power_Tax_Academic_Supports_FULL_</ref> and singles (''positive punishment''). Further, one could consider ''negative reinforcement'', e.g. by removing burdens that are associated with pairing up, e.g. abolishing harassment laws.
Blackpillers have proposed state subvention could pay male and female incels for pairing up (''positive reinforcement''). Similarly, one could disincentivize promiscuity and singlehood instead, e.g. by taxing promiscuous behavior<ref>https://www.academia.edu/40699045/Flower_Power_Tax_Academic_Supports_FULL_</ref> and singles (''positive punishment''). Further, one could remove burdens that are associated with pairing up, e.g. abolishing harassment laws and feminism (''negative reinforcement'').
Lastly, one could do ''negative punishment'', e.g. depriving female singles of certain benefits they may have. Of course there may be ethical concerns.
Lastly, one could e.g. deprive female singles of certain benefits they may have (''negative punishment''). Of course there may be ethical concerns.
</li><li>
</li><li>
Since much of inceldom appears to be linked to economic stagnation and hitting (perceived) limits of growth such as overpopulation, another solution consist in increasing economic growth, and perhaps expanding the population beyond Earth by e.g. colonizing Mars, however such solutions are only relevant for future generations.
Since much of inceldom appears to be linked to economic stagnation and hitting (perceived) limits of growth such as overpopulation, another solution consist in increasing economic growth, and perhaps expanding the population beyond Earth by e.g. colonizing Mars, however such solutions are only relevant for future generations.
17,538

edits

Navigation menu