Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,914 bytes added ,  29 September 2019
Line 3,885: Line 3,885:
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
* Alexander MG, Fisher TD. 2003. ''Truth and Consequences: Using the Bogus Pipeline to Examine Sex Differences in Self-Reported Sexuality.'' The Journal of Sex Research. 40(1): 27-35. [[https://www.jstor.org/stable/3813768?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Abstract]] [[https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3936-fake-lie-detector-reveals-womens-sex-lies/ News]]
* Alexander MG, Fisher TD. 2003. ''Truth and Consequences: Using the Bogus Pipeline to Examine Sex Differences in Self-Reported Sexuality.'' The Journal of Sex Research. 40(1): 27-35. [[https://www.jstor.org/stable/3813768?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Abstract]] [[https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3936-fake-lie-detector-reveals-womens-sex-lies/ News]]
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Women get 2-3 times as much casual sexual relationships from Tinder than men</span>===
----
A study about Tinder usage in Belgium by Timmermans and Courtois (2018) found that 21.87% (95% CI: 18.66, 25.07) of female users, but only 9.33% (6.48, 12.18) of male users used Tinder to engage in casual sexual relationships, i.e. ''2.34 times'' (1.67, 3.29) as likely as men.
Some, but not all of this may be explained by a gender imbalance in the sex ratio of Tinder users: In 2015, 62% of Tinder users were male and 38% female.
While women overall may not seem to have more sex (GSS suggests an increase in sexlessness for women as well){{citation needed}}, it does seem a minority of women (around 21.87% of female Tinder users) has lots of sex and can get it substantially easier than men.
The impression that women have become sluttier women may also come from the rise of self-sexualization (e.g. in online media, but also in the public) which appears to be driven by female intra-sexual competition and economic uncertainty/inequality, i.e. women self-sexualizing themselves to get attention from the more and more rare economically advantaged men (see Blake 2018).
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
* Timmermans E, Courtois C. 2018. ''From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: Exploring the experiences of Tinder users.'' [[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01972243.2017.1414093 Abstract]]
* See also: https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/bnj3jj/doing_some_math_on_that_belgian_tinder_study_to/
* Blake KR, Bastian B, Denson TF, Grosjean P and Brooks RC. 2018. ''Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualization on social media.'' [[http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/08/20/1717959115 Abstract]]


===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Women who have tattoos or piercings or wear chokers are more promiscuous</span>===
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Women who have tattoos or piercings or wear chokers are more promiscuous</span>===
17,538

edits

Navigation menu