Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Cook was the subject of a thread on a private pro-Trump [[Facebook]] community about whether she is sexually desirable. She wrote that she was "stunned" by the attention, but did not say she disliked it.<ref>[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/i-was-sexually-harassed-on-facebook_us_5a919efae4b0ee6416a3be76 Facebook Didn’t Seem To Care I Was Being Sexually Harassed Until I Decided To Write About It], HuffPost</ref> | Cook was the subject of a thread on a private pro-Trump [[Facebook]] community about whether she is sexually desirable. She wrote that she was "stunned" by the attention, but did not say she disliked it.<ref>[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/i-was-sexually-harassed-on-facebook_us_5a919efae4b0ee6416a3be76 Facebook Didn’t Seem To Care I Was Being Sexually Harassed Until I Decided To Write About It], HuffPost</ref> | ||
[[Conchis]] remarks, with regard to Cook's Twitter background photo, "She knows she has fabulous tits. Her ass is kinda flat, but her tits defy belief. There is no better position for great tits than the side-boob shot. There is only one explanation for a chick with a fantastic rack who makes a side-boob shot her background pic. And it is '''''not''''' an innocent mistake." | [[Conchis]] remarks, with regard to Cook's Twitter background photo, "She knows she has fabulous tits. Her ass is kinda flat, but her tits defy belief. There is no better position for great tits than the side-[[boobs|boob]] shot. There is only one explanation for a chick with a fantastic rack who makes a side-boob shot her background pic. And it is '''''not''''' an innocent mistake." | ||
==Articles== | ==Articles== |