Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
21 bytes removed ,  25 October 2018
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


[[File:blackpill.png|thumb|right|<center></center>‎]]
[[File:blackpill.png|thumb|right|<center></center>‎]]
The '''blackpill''' is a philosophy about human sexuality first proposed by a commenter named Paragon on the Dalrock anti-[[feminist]] blog and later adopted by OmegaVirginRevolt's blog.  Paragon appears to be the same person who runs this blog: https://sirtyrionlannister.wordpress.com. In his comment, Paragon defines the blackpill to mean '''a rejection of individualism and an acceptance of a fatalistic worldview from a belief that women's tendency to pick, [[assholes|"selfish replicators"]], over [[nice guy]]s can't be changed unless society becomes less prosperous'''.  
The '''blackpill''' is a philosophy about human sexuality first proposed by a commenter named Paragon on the Dalrock anti-[[feminist]] blog and later adopted by OmegaVirginRevolt's blog.  Paragon appears to be the same person who runs this blog: https://sirtyrionlannister.wordpress.com. In his comment, Paragon defines the blackpill to mean '''a rejection of individualism and an acceptance of a fatalistic worldview from a belief that women's tendency to pick, [[assholes|"selfish replicators"]], over [[nice guy]]s can't be changed until society becomes less prosperous'''.  


In paragons words, the blackpill means<ref>https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/she-felt-unloved/#comment-22914</ref>: {{Quote|to reconcile that there are no personal solutions to systemic problems – which can only resolve over evolutionary time.
In paragons words:<ref>https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/she-felt-unloved/#comment-22914</ref>: {{Quote|to reconcile that there are no personal solutions to systemic problems – which can only resolve over evolutionary time.


And any solution will very much entail steep trade-offs, in that males can’t have their cake and eat it too – a prosperous population of deferred ecological pressures(like we currently enjoy), without an expectation that this prosperity will increase the mating latitude of females(dramatically perturbing the breeding population, to the point of near evolutionary instability).
And any solution will very much entail steep trade-offs, in that males can’t have their cake and eat it too – a prosperous population of deferred ecological pressures(like we currently enjoy), without an expectation that this prosperity will increase the mating latitude of females(dramatically perturbing the breeding population, to the point of near evolutionary instability).
25,837

edits

Navigation menu