Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Feminism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
interlinking bot
No edit summary |
(interlinking bot) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Over a hundred years ago, advanced technology and industrialization came around made by men, making jobs safer for women, and women joined the workforce. Now that women were comfy enough to claim taxpayer status, men gave women the vote and positions of power in politics and the workplace. This occurred before the 'feminist movement' even began. The first wave feminist movement mainly occured in the late 19th century, with Denmark being the first country having a feminist movement starting in 1871. Women started getting the right to vote in the 1700s, the same century the industrial revolution started. | Over a hundred years ago, advanced technology and industrialization came around made by men, making jobs safer for women, and women joined the workforce. Now that women were comfy enough to claim taxpayer status, men gave women the vote and positions of power in politics and the workplace. This occurred before the 'feminist movement' even began. The first wave feminist movement mainly occured in the late 19th century, with Denmark being the first country having a feminist movement starting in 1871. Women started getting the right to vote in the 1700s, the same century the industrial revolution started. | ||
Only problem with this new paradigm is that women usually aren't sexually attracted to men who are lower in hierarchies of social status and money than they are. So as women gained dominance in traditional male hierarchies, they complained a bunch about there being 'no good men'<ref>https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3bj5yv/youre-single-because-there-arent-enough-men-253</ref><ref>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6004239/High-flying-career-women-refusing-marry-despite-struggling-Mr-Right.html</ref> aka the dwindling amount of men wealthier or more powerful than them to give them [[tingles]]. As less men gave them [[tingles]] more [[incel|incels]] were created and more men were [[MGTOW|sent their own way]]. And as women gained more dominance in society they complained more about beta males, and "[[rape]]" etc... | Only problem with this new paradigm is that women usually aren't sexually attracted to men who are lower in hierarchies of [[social status]] and money than they are. So as women gained dominance in traditional male hierarchies, they complained a bunch about there being 'no good men'<ref>https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3bj5yv/youre-single-because-there-arent-enough-men-253</ref><ref>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6004239/High-flying-career-women-refusing-marry-despite-struggling-Mr-Right.html</ref> aka the dwindling amount of men wealthier or more powerful than them to give them [[tingles]]. As less men gave them [[tingles]] more [[incel|incels]] were created and more men were [[MGTOW|sent their own way]]. And as women gained more dominance in society they complained more about beta males, and "[[rape]]" etc... | ||
They even created campaigns against these increasing amount of men lower on the social hierarchy than them they are not sexually attracted to like the: | They even created campaigns against these increasing amount of men lower on the social hierarchy than them they are not sexually attracted to like the: | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==The Eradication of Feminism is Best for Incels... Theory== | ==The Eradication of Feminism is Best for Incels... Theory== | ||
Because feminism has created more incels, many if not most self-identified incels don't subscribe to the previous theory and think '''modern''' matriarchies won't be sexually generous. They should argue for a generous patriarchy with strictly socially enforced monogamy as not all patriarchies are alike. In most if not all modern patriachal countries, polygyny arises and men hoard women, causing inceldom as well. And in patriarchal muslim countries, the hoarding of women in harems, inflates the bride-price so high that there exists a vast underclass of singe men who are susceptible to the promise of either real life brides or virgin brides in the afterlife through terrorist organization like [[al-Qaeda]] or [[ISIS]]. It is for this reason that people joke about incels and muslims terrorists on incel boards. Some incels also believe that the only kind of pro-natalism that can be achieved to wipe out inceldom would be through a racial supremacist movement, which partly explains why people like [[Richard Spencer]] pander to incels. | Because feminism has created more incels, many if not most self-identified incels don't subscribe to the previous theory and think '''modern''' matriarchies won't be sexually generous. They should argue for a generous patriarchy with strictly socially enforced monogamy as not all patriarchies are alike. In most if not all modern patriachal countries, [[polygyny]] arises and men hoard women, causing [[inceldom]] as well. And in patriarchal muslim countries, the hoarding of women in harems, inflates the bride-price so high that there exists a vast underclass of singe men who are susceptible to the promise of either real life brides or virgin brides in the afterlife through terrorist organization like [[al-Qaeda]] or [[ISIS]]. It is for this reason that people joke about incels and muslims terrorists on incel boards. Some incels also believe that the only kind of pro-natalism that can be achieved to wipe out [[inceldom]] would be through a racial supremacist movement, which partly explains why people like [[Richard Spencer]] pander to incels. | ||
==The Less Difference Between the Sexes, the Less of a Problem Feminism Becomes== | ==The Less Difference Between the Sexes, the Less of a Problem Feminism Becomes== | ||
[[Otto Weininger]] argued that in humans, the less sexually dimorphic the genders, the less of a problem female sexual liberation becomes. Whereas, if there is high sexual dimorphism in humans, female sexual liberation leads to agitation, domestic abuse against husbands, and [[IM LIEK SUCH A NERD LOL|corruption of the arts and science by feminine women expressing vanity and seeking male attention]]. | [[Otto Weininger]] argued that in humans, the less sexually dimorphic the genders, the less of a problem female [[sexual liberation]] becomes. Whereas, if there is high [[sexual dimorphism]] in humans, female [[sexual liberation]] leads to agitation, domestic abuse against husbands, and [[IM LIEK SUCH A NERD LOL|corruption of the arts and science by feminine women expressing vanity and seeking male attention]]. | ||
The problem is that sexually liberated women naturally promote [[sexual dimorphism|sexual dimorphism]], as seen in apps like Tinder. So obviously, freeing the sexual marketplace isn't the first step to a free sexual market without civilizational decline. In order to establish women a free sexual market peacefully, if such a thing were desirable, first attention should be paid to reducing [[sexual dimorphism]] or sex differences, even if that means reducing female sexual choice temporarily. If such a change were made permanent, and there was very little sexual dimorphism between the sexes, to the point of almost not being able to distinguish between the sexes, female sexual liberation would probably not lead to civilizational decline, or at least the kind that we see now. | The problem is that sexually liberated women naturally promote [[sexual dimorphism|sexual dimorphism]], as seen in apps like Tinder. So obviously, freeing the sexual marketplace isn't the first step to a free sexual market without civilizational decline. In order to establish women a free sexual market peacefully, if such a thing were desirable, first attention should be paid to reducing [[sexual dimorphism]] or sex differences, even if that means reducing female sexual choice temporarily. If such a change were made permanent, and there was very little [[sexual dimorphism]] between the sexes, to the point of almost not being able to distinguish between the sexes, female [[sexual liberation]] would probably not lead to civilizational decline, or at least the kind that we see now. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||