Talk:Dogpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
BTW I have added a section on [[Omega male]] Deconstructing its relationship from the E-boys perspective, but damn that is a good take | BTW I have added a section on [[Omega male]] Deconstructing its relationship from the E-boys perspective, but damn that is a good take | ||
== Dogs == | ==Dogs== | ||
https://www.ladbible.com/news/news-women-sleep-better-next-to-dogs-than-men-according-to-science-20210902 | https://www.ladbible.com/news/news-women-sleep-better-next-to-dogs-than-men-according-to-science-20210902 | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:This is all pretty well known.<br>-"Due to the fact that the fifties were much more conservative and prudish, the average civilian typically wasn't receptive to answering questions about their sex lives; thus people who do respond to survey's tend to be more sexually deviant than average."<br>This would also lead to social desirability bias that would underestimate the prevalence of such behavior. So the bias would go both ways, which may lead to a more accurate estimate.<br>"For example Kinsey most notoriosly claimed that 10% of all men are gay (in general estimates of rates of homosexuality don't typically exceed 2% in contemporary survey's)."<br>- This figure tracks with other surveys of self-described participation in homosexual acts, I don't really care what people call themselves but what they do. Exclusive homosexuals seem rare in both sexes. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/apr/05/10-per-cent-population-gay-alfred-kinsey-statistics<br>Probably his estimates were off for some samples but not horribly so. There are still no really good quality studies on this stuff up until the contemporary era. You could criticize all of them for the same reasons. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 07:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC) | :This is all pretty well known.<br>-"Due to the fact that the fifties were much more conservative and prudish, the average civilian typically wasn't receptive to answering questions about their sex lives; thus people who do respond to survey's tend to be more sexually deviant than average."<br>This would also lead to social desirability bias that would underestimate the prevalence of such behavior. So the bias would go both ways, which may lead to a more accurate estimate.<br>"For example Kinsey most notoriosly claimed that 10% of all men are gay (in general estimates of rates of homosexuality don't typically exceed 2% in contemporary survey's)."<br>- This figure tracks with other surveys of self-described participation in homosexual acts, I don't really care what people call themselves but what they do. Exclusive homosexuals seem rare in both sexes. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/apr/05/10-per-cent-population-gay-alfred-kinsey-statistics<br>Probably his estimates were off for some samples but not horribly so. There are still no really good quality studies on this stuff up until the contemporary era. You could criticize all of them for the same reasons. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 07:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC) | ||
== Furries == | ==Furries== | ||
Are furries related to this phenomenon? Seems like most of them are foids. | Are furries related to this phenomenon? Seems like most of them are foids | ||
:Not really. Furries involve sapient animal characters in a fictional context, meaning they think and behave like humans. While a lot of furry artwork and stories admittedly do involve graphic depictions of animal genitalia, they're mostly treated as ferishes specific to those characters in their anthropomorphic forms, separating them from real animals. I think the brief reference to this in the "secret language" section of the article already covers that. | |||