6,353
edits
Talk:Dogpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
moved this here as, while valid, adding to much qualifying detail makes this article less funny, IMO, could be integrated more succinctly into the page
m (moved this here as, while valid, adding to much qualifying detail makes this article less funny, IMO, could be integrated more succinctly into the page) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
https://www.ladbible.com/news/news-women-sleep-better-next-to-dogs-than-men-according-to-science-20210902 | https://www.ladbible.com/news/news-women-sleep-better-next-to-dogs-than-men-according-to-science-20210902 | ||
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-women-sleep-better-with-dogs | https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-women-sleep-better-with-dogs | ||
==Kinsey was wrong== | |||
" However there is much reason to doubt Kinsey's figure of 3.6%. For example Kinsey most notoriosly claimed that 10% of all men are gay (in general estimates of rates of homosexuality don't typically exceed 2% in contemporary survey's). | |||
Moreover, self-reported surveys attempting to determine the prevalence of zoophilic sexual activities most likely suffer from a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_desirability_bias severe bias] in that respondents underreport such deviant sexual behavior. | |||
Due to the fact that the fifties were much more conservative and prudish, the average civilian typically wasn't receptive to answering questions about their sex lives; thus people who do respond to survey's tend to be more sexually deviant than average. Kinsey's data has also been criticized on the basis of being non-representative; Kinsey would often purposefully select participants who were more sexually deviant so as to skew the data (he would interview prisoners and then claim that his data was representative of the wider culture for example)" - https://incels.wiki/w/Special:Contributions/197.185.111.11 | |||