Trusted, Automoderated users
398
edits
Heightpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→If you are under 5'6", you are exponentially less attractive than average men
m (the pedolet hypothesis, and how it can be undetermined.) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==The Pedo-Manlet Hypothesis== | ==The Pedo-Manlet Hypothesis== | ||
A small sample study<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17952597</ref>noted that the division between Pedophiles and non-pedos is of a height of 5 foot and 9.5 inches (with 95% confidence). A larger scale study<ref>https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1254986</ref> deduced that pedophiles are a quarter inch shorter than regular offenders. It can be hypothesized that shorter people are more likely to be disposed to pedophilic phenotypes. However, this has not take to account [[Life history|Life History]], masculinity and other biofactors (see also "masculinized" digit ratio in study<ref>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-018-0326-0</ref>). | A small sample study<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17952597</ref>noted that the division between Pedophiles and non-pedos is of a height of 5 foot and 9.5 inches (with 95% confidence). A larger scale study<ref>https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1254986</ref> deduced that pedophiles are a quarter inch shorter than regular offenders. It can be hypothesized that shorter people are more likely to be disposed to pedophilic phenotypes. However, this has not take to account [[Life history|Life History]], masculinity and other biofactors (see also "masculinized" digit ratio in study<ref>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-018-0326-0</ref>). | ||
== Tallfaggot advantage in online dating == | == Tallfaggot advantage in online dating == | ||
Stating your [[height]] in an online [[dating]] profile could fuck you over badly if you’re a [[manlet]]. According to a particular [[dating]] app, firstmet, the ideal [[height]] related to most matches in males was 6’2” (188 cm). | Stating your [[height]] in an online [[dating]] profile could fuck you over badly if you’re a [[manlet]]. According to a particular [[dating]] app, firstmet, the ideal [[height]] related to most matches in males was 6’2” (188 cm). | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
[[File:Sergg.jpg|900x900px|center|<center></center>]] | [[File:Sergg.jpg|900x900px|center|<center></center>]] | ||
In a study on humans published in Animal Studies, it was shown that men who are between 5'3" (160 cm) and 5'6" (168 cm) are anywhere from 3–10 times less attractive than average height men, solely because of their height.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236670565_The_height_of_choosiness_Mutual_mate_choice_for_stature_results_in_suboptimal_pair_formation_for_both_sexes</ref> | In a study on humans published in Animal Studies, it was shown that men who are between 5'3" (160 cm) and 5'6" (168 cm) are anywhere from 3–10 times less attractive than average height men, solely because of their height.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236670565_The_height_of_choosiness_Mutual_mate_choice_for_stature_results_in_suboptimal_pair_formation_for_both_sexes</ref> | ||
==== Caveat ==== | |||
It is known that there are diminishing returns on height, and that for every 1 inch above 6 feet, the chances of getting a woman is equivalent to having 1 inch less than 6 feet. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+Lanklet vs Manlet with equal chances | |||
!Height over 72 inches | |||
!73 | |||
!74 | |||
!75 | |||
!76 | |||
!77 | |||
!78 | |||
!79 | |||
|- | |||
|Height under 72 inches | |||
|71 | |||
|70 | |||
|69.5 | |||
|69 | |||
|68 | |||
|67.5 | |||
|67 | |||
|- | |||
|Chances (%) | |||
|95 | |||
|90 | |||
|80 | |||
|70 | |||
|55 | |||
|40 | |||
|35 | |||
|} | |||
==Bluepill argument on Heightmatching== | ==Bluepill argument on Heightmatching== | ||
The Bluepill argument against the heightpill is that the male-female height difference is platonic at 15cm<ref>https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-common-is-it-for-a-man-to-be-shorter-than-his-partner/</ref> or 6in<ref>https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2019/11/06/man-woman-couple-height-updated/</ref>. CoffeeMeetsBagel<ref>https://coffeemeetsbagel.com/blog/dating-statistics/how-tall-are-you-really/</ref> reflects this sentiment as well. | The Bluepill argument against the heightpill is that the male-female height difference is platonic at 15cm<ref>https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-common-is-it-for-a-man-to-be-shorter-than-his-partner/</ref> or 6in<ref>https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2019/11/06/man-woman-couple-height-updated/</ref>. CoffeeMeetsBagel<ref>https://coffeemeetsbagel.com/blog/dating-statistics/how-tall-are-you-really/</ref> reflects this sentiment as well. | ||
| Line 96: | Line 128: | ||
This is why the curve is not as steep in these results as it would be IRL. | This is why the curve is not as steep in these results as it would be IRL. | ||
== Counter to Heightpill: Heightmatching == | |||
[[File:Heightmatching.jpg|thumb|It is rare to find a tall female dating a short guy, or that the guy is 10 inches (25cm) taller than the girl.]] | |||
According to Atlantic (2009)<ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/01/why-its-so-rare-for-a-wife-to-be-taller-than-her-husband/272585/</ref> and PN Cohen's Research (2017)<ref>https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2019/11/06/man-woman-couple-height-updated/</ref>, the average distribution of height difference between couples should be '''6 inches (15cm)''', and that observed height difference has less variance and more leftward shew than random sampling of males and females (it is rarer than random chance to find someone with a height difference of more than '''10 inches (25cm)''', or that the female is taller than the male. This leads to the question of female entitlement and "size kinks". | |||
==Videos on height and dating== | ==Videos on height and dating== | ||
A TV reportage shows the heightpill by interviewing scientists, as well as conducting an experiment, proving that below 5'3 (160 cm), [[it never began]]: | A TV reportage shows the heightpill by interviewing scientists, as well as conducting an experiment, proving that below 5'3 (160 cm), [[it never began]]: | ||