User talk:Bibipi: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,455 bytes added ,  2 January 2022
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 54: Line 54:
==Main Page redesign==
==Main Page redesign==
Feel free to add here https://incels.wiki/w/Draft:Main_Page [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 13:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Feel free to add here https://incels.wiki/w/Draft:Main_Page [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 13:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
==requesting clarification on your paraphrasing re the Brooke Jenkins study==
In [[special:diff/69638]] I linked back to what you had added to the intro.
I removed it temporarily because when I searched the PDF it seemed inconsistent with the average partner counts reported in the lede.
I'm hoping you can clarify more specifically about the relevance of the d=0.22 stuff in comparison to the other data, in which case it can be added back.
Doing a Ctrl-F on page 6/14 it seems to be what you're talking about:
:Looking at mean differences in the number of partners between the tall men and other categories, only the very short men differed from tall men by an effect size larger than d = 0.20, reporting fewer partners
(d = 0.22).
I think maybe the problem is we don't explain the meaning of "d" here.
Something like "the average number of partners" is easy to discern. If we subtract the avg 9.4 for men 5'2-5'4 from the avg 12 for men 5'11-6'1 we get 2.6 for example.
So I'm struggling to understand what d=0.22 means in respect to that average 2.6 difference in partner count.
It's been a while since I studied stats so I hope you'll be patient with me. I think our average reader is even less informed than me though so we should definitely spell this out more plainly. If we use advanced math language it should be preceded with explanations of "d" an so on. [[User:Wizard32|Wiz]] ([[User talk:Wizard32|talk]]) 00:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
574

edits

Navigation menu