General discussion: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
574 bytes added ,  10 September 2021
(How to throw FDS into a headspin)
Line 125: Line 125:
** Claim: Smarter women are less prone to predatory behavior, Ignore predatory men <nowiki>https://archive.fo/CwZOy</nowiki>
** Claim: Smarter women are less prone to predatory behavior, Ignore predatory men <nowiki>https://archive.fo/CwZOy</nowiki>
*** Refutation: Smarter women are generally less attractive, similar to high-IQ men
*** Refutation: Smarter women are generally less attractive, similar to high-IQ men
*** Refutation: More dominant females are generally less attractive, especially those male who are masculinized https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X08002298
*** Refutation: More dominant females are generally less attractive, especially that male who are masculinized https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X08002298
*** Refutation: Unfortunately, more dominant females are attracted to more masculine men https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0018506X07000074
*** Refutation: Unfortunately, more dominant females are attracted to more masculine men https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0018506X07000074
** Claim: Social Media is Pavlovian to women, so block men who leaves women on read https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/QyziE
** Claim: Social Media is Pavlovian to women, so block men who leave women on reading https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/QyziE
*** Refutation: This attitude trains men into Pavlovian conditioning, making them less desirable in the BetaBuxx front
*** Refutation: This attitude trains men into Pavlovian conditioning, making them less desirable in the BetaBuxx front
** Claim: Emotionally isolate men til they demonstrate value https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/2Bw5T
** Claim: Emotionally isolate men til they demonstrate value https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/2Bw5T
*** Refutation: This trick mainly works on women, but not men. CRP's "treat nerds like women" claim https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZeWDr3mdrY
*** Refutation: This trick mainly works on women, but not men. CRP's "treat nerds like women" claim https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZeWDr3mdrY
*** Refutation: A man who is highly desired would have other options.
*** Refutation: A man who is highly desired would have other options and can move on
** Claim: Don't stop chasing the ideal handsome prince <nowiki>https://archive.fo/qgfOo</nowiki> https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/7VytT
** Claim: Don't stop chasing the ideal handsome prince <nowiki>https://archive.fo/qgfOo</nowiki> https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/7VytT
*** Refutation: SMV is related to mainly Age in women (for both Short-Term Relationships and Long-Term Relationships)
*** Refutation: SMV is related to mainly Age in women (for both Short-Term Relationships and Long-Term Relationships)
 
** Problem: Inability to stop "Pickme Behavior" https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/22QU9
* Problem: Inability to stop "Pickme Behavior" https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/22QU9
** Problem: "Strength & Independence" attracts "Losers" (Agepill-based Tutorial Island aka Oedipal Complex) https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/jqA4C
* Problem: "Strength & Independence" attracts "Losers" (Agepill-based Tutorial Island) https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/jqA4C
** Them thinking that The Wall or Milkmiring is not real https://archive.fo/s1OTu
* Claim: Non-Endorsement of Casual Sex will attract good men <nowiki>https://archive.fo/rs95O</nowiki> <nowiki>https://archive.fo/RdcPH</nowiki>
* Claim: Non-Endorsement of Casual Sex will attract good men <nowiki>https://archive.fo/rs95O</nowiki> <nowiki>https://archive.fo/RdcPH</nowiki>
 
** Refutation: Those who do not care about sex are likely to be highly religious, therefore would not want Career Women
** Claim that this is true (religious) https://archive.fo/b7CrU
** Refutation Validity: The desire for a stronger relationship is best aided by sex between one to three months https://archive.fo/LSPTQ
* Their definition of "Value" is their Ego rather than Work/Utility/Status <nowiki>https://archive.fo/nSnzj</nowiki>
* Their definition of "Value" is their Ego rather than Work/Utility/Status <nowiki>https://archive.fo/nSnzj</nowiki>
* Their anti-fuckboy cope <nowiki>https://archive.fo/LHaHS</nowiki> https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/ySvvc
* Their anti-fuckboy cope <nowiki>https://archive.fo/LHaHS</nowiki> https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/ySvvc
** Sexual Imprinting Theory?
* They want bigger penis size in order to accept sex https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/ge46l
* They want bigger penis size in order to accept sex https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/ge46l
** Refutation: Females are just generally less likely to orgasm, and they fake orgasm on attractive males
* Non-Endorsement of BDSM <nowiki>https://archive.fo/m1sX5</nowiki> especially when the male is dominant https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/P5vtS
* Non-Endorsement of BDSM <nowiki>https://archive.fo/m1sX5</nowiki> especially when the male is dominant https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/P5vtS
** Problem: Gated BDSM Practitioners are generally more attractive, dominant and wealthy
** Problem: Gated BDSM Practitioners are generally more attractive, dominant and wealthy
398

edits

Navigation menu