General discussion: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3,247 bytes added ,  10 September 2021
How to throw FDS into a headspin
(How to throw FDS into a headspin)
Line 112: Line 112:
** Physical Contact: Excuse for contact and accentuation of beauty for "Chads", Misaligned Foot, Head or Naval for "Subfive"
** Physical Contact: Excuse for contact and accentuation of beauty for "Chads", Misaligned Foot, Head or Naval for "Subfive"
** Psychological: Female Approach and Negatives as Positives for "Chads", Soft Rejections for "Normies", Social Shunning and Positives as Negatives for "Subfive"
** Psychological: Female Approach and Negatives as Positives for "Chads", Soft Rejections for "Normies", Social Shunning and Positives as Negatives for "Subfive"
== Viewing Male Requirements from the eyes of women ==
How to prove that what women want is extremely rare, if not impossible. AKA "Pick Two" memes.
* Chads vs "Soft Boys" vs "Nice Guys" https://archive.fo/b4JJW
* With more ways of sub-detailing the three traits <nowiki>https://archive.fo/13BTn</nowiki> and https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/ZDNkx
** "Nice Guys" ("respectful"): The clinger / The parental seeker (Translation: I do not like men with good intentions) => https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/PW69W
** "Soft Boys" ("financially responsible"): The unavailable man / The mentally ill man (Translation: Please provide me more than your Buxx AND your attention) => https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/hxhM3
** Chads ("attractive"): The man with the hidden life / The violent man / The predator (Translation: Chad will not treat me like a Queen) => https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/pSzSB
* Their conceptualization of "Pink Pill Truths" https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/ERqup
* Their Tactic of "Ignoring bad men, whilst can't find good men"
** Claim: Smarter women are less prone to predatory behavior, Ignore predatory men <nowiki>https://archive.fo/CwZOy</nowiki>
*** Refutation: Smarter women are generally less attractive, similar to high-IQ men
*** Refutation: More dominant females are generally less attractive, especially those male who are masculinized https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X08002298
*** Refutation: Unfortunately, more dominant females are attracted to more masculine men https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0018506X07000074
** Claim: Social Media is Pavlovian to women, so block men who leaves women on read https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/QyziE
*** Refutation: This attitude trains men into Pavlovian conditioning, making them less desirable in the BetaBuxx front
** Claim: Emotionally isolate men til they demonstrate value https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/2Bw5T
*** Refutation: This trick mainly works on women, but not men. CRP's "treat nerds like women" claim https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZeWDr3mdrY
*** Refutation: A man who is highly desired would have other options.
** Claim: Don't stop chasing the ideal handsome prince <nowiki>https://archive.fo/qgfOo</nowiki> https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/7VytT
*** Refutation: SMV is related to mainly Age in women (for both Short-Term Relationships and Long-Term Relationships)
* Problem: Inability to stop "Pickme Behavior" https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/22QU9
* Problem: "Strength & Independence" attracts "Losers" (Agepill-based Tutorial Island) https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/jqA4C
* Claim: Non-Endorsement of Casual Sex will attract good men <nowiki>https://archive.fo/rs95O</nowiki> <nowiki>https://archive.fo/RdcPH</nowiki>
* Their definition of "Value" is their Ego rather than Work/Utility/Status <nowiki>https://archive.fo/nSnzj</nowiki>
* Their anti-fuckboy cope <nowiki>https://archive.fo/LHaHS</nowiki> https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/ySvvc
* They want bigger penis size in order to accept sex https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/ge46l
* Non-Endorsement of BDSM <nowiki>https://archive.fo/m1sX5</nowiki> especially when the male is dominant https://archive.fo<nowiki/>/P5vtS
** Problem: Gated BDSM Practitioners are generally more attractive, dominant and wealthy
398

edits

Navigation menu