Talk:Juggernaut law: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==There's also a juggernaut law for men== But it's a lot weaker, and the SMV cutoff before the guy is too unattractive for it to apply anymore is higher. If a guy is too attr...")
 
 
Line 7: Line 7:


We actually used to have a whole article about how some chicks find Chads intimidating, but it got deleted for being too poorly-written or something. Nonetheless, there was a thread on this topic at [[Roosh V Forum]], or at least there was before they closed down their game sub-forums. [[Special:Contributions/69.244.230.1|69.244.230.1]] 01:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
We actually used to have a whole article about how some chicks find Chads intimidating, but it got deleted for being too poorly-written or something. Nonetheless, there was a thread on this topic at [[Roosh V Forum]], or at least there was before they closed down their game sub-forums. [[Special:Contributions/69.244.230.1|69.244.230.1]] 01:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
That sounds like the debate between the 80-20 rule in a safe society, and Dual Mating Strategy in an unstable society https://www.jstor.org/stable/25511659
== Sam Hyde v Alexander Grace: Whether Juggernaut Law is Useful or Not ==
Sam Hyde (YES Wife Ugly, "High Maintenance" is high entitlement): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO06NNFLYiU
Alexander Grace (NO Dating Ugly, Regression Towards the mean of females): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LV6bT_I-I3o
Women who date lower do it to boost their ego, women who date higher will "fake" submission https://www.nel.edu/userfiles/articlesnew/NEL350714A16.pdf
Family History and "Dating Lower" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19832934
398

edits

Navigation menu