Feminism: Difference between revisions

[[Otto Weininger]] argued that in humans, the less sexually dimorphic the genders, the less of a problem [[feminism|female sexual liberation]] becomes.  Whereas, if there is high sexual dimorphism in humans, {[feminism|female sexual liberation]] leads to agitation, domestic abuse against husbands, and [[IM LIEK SUCH A NERD LOL|corruption of the arts and science by feminine women only gamergirl|expressing vanity and seeking male attention]].

The problem is that sexually liberated women naturally promote [[sexual dimorphism|sexual dimorphism]], as seen in apps like Tinder. So obviously, freeing the sexual marketplace isn't the first step to a free sexual market without civilizational decline.  In order to liberate women peacefully, if such a thing were desirable, first attention should be paid to reducing [[sexual dimorphism]] or sex differences, even if that means reducing female sexual choice temporarily.  If such a change were made permanent, and there was very little sexual dimorphism between the sexes, female sexual liberation would probably not lead to civilizational decline, or at least the kind that we see now.