Talk:Women in STEM: Difference between revisions

Talk:Women in STEM (edit)

741 bytes added , 23 June 2021

m

no edit summary

6,353

edits

Revision as of 18:52, 22 June 2021 (edit) Bibipi (talk \| contribs) (→‎Move to "Women in science"?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:44, 23 June 2021 (edit) (undo) Altmark22 (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 53:		Line 53:

	E.g. due to the significance of women in the social sciences, which is not really STEM. [[User:Bibipi\|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi\|talk]]) 18:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)		E.g. due to the significance of women in the social sciences, which is not really STEM. [[User:Bibipi\|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi\|talk]]) 18:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
			:The popular meme surrounding the term tends to use the term "STEM" more. And it's generally focused on getting more women in realms where they are unrepresented, so the formal science fields where there is a lot of growth (machine learning, programming etc). The exclusion of social sciences from STEM doesn't seem clear, though many universities do only include natural and formal sciences as part of this category:https://stem.ucdavis.edu/what-is-stem/</br>However, since the whole article is more memey than academic is tone and broadly a rant opposing the general influence of women in academia at all, I suppose "women in science" would fit better. [[User:Altmark22\|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22\|talk]]) 20:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)